Unconfirmed Report Of Explosions In Iran, Hundreds Reported Dead

A huge explosion has reportedly hit a shopping mall in Isfahan in Iran earlier on Sunday night, with hundreds of people feared dead in the blast and subsequent fires.

Witnesses have reported Revolutionary Guards and Basij forces speeding to the area.

Unconfirmed Report Of Explosions In Iran, Hundreds Reported Dead

I cannot find any official source for this news. The only one available is from this site and also debka. Honestly I can't vouch for neither and I'm not sure about how serious is debka. All I know is that was funded as an alternative news source 15 years ago. The main site though seams to refer to a local source . Checking the twitter too right now but no info so far.

a reply to: Telos

False flag, false flag !!!!!!! Take your pick of choices but I said it first.


(Hypocritical sarcasm)

a reply to: Telos

The last debka was a hoax about the Iranian embassy.

Thanks for the heads up. Ill look for other sources too.

Twitter says it's real
mobile.twitter.com...


I'm on my phone but if someone could image.google.com that photo and see if it's unique we would know.

originally posted by: Legman
Twitter says it's real
mobile.twitter.com...


I'm on my phone but if someone could image.google.com that photo and see if it's unique we would know.

Thanks for the source it confirmed unconfirmed reports.

From twitter:

Huge explosion in Tehran. more than 290 killed in a tower owned by Khamenei

Just did a search, Windsor tower showed up. Removing pic.

Well glad that the source was accurate and also to bad that the news is real So many lives spent. Poor people.

We've got a hoax


911research.wtc7.net...



downloaded image... used image.google.com to reverse search the photo.

its from 2005

a reply to: stosh64

That image is from the Madrid Windsor fire.
www.911myths.com...

Are there any suggestions as to the cause. I can't find reports anywhere. I'm praying for those poor people involved and their families.

a reply to: Phage

Roger that, I searched it too.

originally posted by: Legman
We've got a hoax


911research.wtc7.net...



downloaded image... used image.google.com to reverse search the photo.

its from 2005

I don't think the photo is the real one. Has been used to describe what happened. In my opinion is just an illustration. Something that is done very often in journalism.

a reply to: Telos

Something that is done very often in journalism.

Twitter is not journalism.

a reply to: Telos

I don't think the photo has been used to describe what happened. In my opinion is just an illustration. Something that is done very often in journalism.

Thats not journalism, its deception.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Telos

Something that is done very often in journalism.

Twitter is not journalism.

That picture was on the news site before it was on twitter. I used to be a journalist. Thanks.

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Telos

I don't think the photo has been used to describe what happened. In my opinion is just an illustration. Something that is done very often in journalism.

Thats not journalism, its deception.

Not when is used to illustrate. The photo is lacking the description which on a news paper would have been written right on the photo. Making its purpose a simple illustration. But since we're dealing with debka and yournewswire things are a bit different.

a reply to: Telos

That is not a news site.

There was an explosion and a building is on fire. Here is a picture of what a building on fire looks like.

Journalism?

a reply to: Telos

That site looks like today's equivalent of The Inquirer.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Telos

That is not a news site.

There was an explosion and a building is on fire. Here is a picture of what a building on fire looks like.

Journalism?

Phage you have the habit to talk to much and say nothing. I don't intend to reply back and forth with you. I said the picture was taken from the news site because yournewswire is such site (despite the seriousness). I didn't coin that source nor I care to do so.

I just said that the picture is not from what happened and explained how is used sometimes in journalism. Yes, I said journalism.

originally posted by: Telos

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Telos

I don't think the photo has been used to describe what happened. In my opinion is just an illustration. Something that is done very often in journalism.

Thats not journalism, its deception.

Not when is used to illustrate. The photo is lacking the description which on a news paper would have been written right on the photo. Making its purpose a simple illustration. But since we're dealing with debka and your newswire things are a bit different.

Yah, lacking the truth… the label you mention is "File Photo", and like you mentioned , its missing. Can't perp a ruse if the "evidence" is falsified, can they…