NASA Data Reveals No Global Warming Polar Ice Retreat

a reply to: raymundoko

Nope, again more fluff and bogus claims on your end. You are a liar, I like the claim about your solar powered boat in hopes to give the perception that you are eco-friendly...nice debate tactic there. All you do is try to cast doubt on good information that supports AGW without provide any significant data to back up your claims.

Just admit that you were unable to provide a residence time calculation. You should know this is relevant to the CO2 issue and also depending on what numbers are used, one can end up with different residence times. Most would agree the 3.8 years in a low estimation of CO2's residence time. What is important is now with the CO2 that we are continually pumping in the atmosphere, CO2's residence time is increasing.

If are really an expert, why not show a residence time calculation for H20?

a reply to: jrod

Just going through my post history from the last month, I've posted links to 19 peer reviewed papers (I didn't even dig as deep as I could have), so your diversionary tactics are as transparent as an open window . As always, I find your degradation of discourse to be par for the course with you. It only shows your true lack of understanding of the sciences involved with climate change. Should I pull up your post where you say you get your data from the TV Show Cosmos?

Looking through your posts for the last month do you know how many peer reviewed papers you've linked? I'll give you a hint, it's less than one.

a reply to: raymundoko

I just noticed you called me a pathological liar. That's fine. This is the internet and we all have our anonymity if we so choose

Yes, and some of us use that anonymity to accuse others of having tyrannous intentions. Sauce for the gander, eh?

a reply to: Astyanax

Your posts allow your message to come across. Tell me, is a government that charges for air not tyrannous? Your words, not mine. What about state sponsored genocide? Your sources, not mine....

a reply to: raymundoko

That's nice, but you also have repeatedly misrepresented what those peer review studies actually said. In order to demonstrate to an intelligent person that you have the experience and knowledge that you claim, why not enlighten us with some simple residence time calculations or hell post the specs on your solar powered boat.

I have lived pretty much off the grid on sailboats for years(not currently, but in the marker for another boat) and even had posters accuse me of lying about my lifestyle, however I can immediately give specs on boats, my most recent was a 29 Roberts designed sailboat 29.9 length, 9.9' beam, sloop rigged, displaced about 9000lbs and had an 11hp volvo diesel MD11 and a 6hp outboard, also I had about 50 watts of solar that kept 2 100amp/hour 12 v deep cycle batteries charged and could get online from the ICW if I anchored close enough to a wifi hotspot. See how easy it is to give some information that backs up my claim.

Instead of posting information that backs up your claims you seem to stick with the tu quoque approach and respond to criticism with more criticism.

So what is the OP about again? I do think the headline is misleading and this thread is worthy of the deconstructing disinformation forum.

You should check your post history...you and I have discussed my boat...

If you further check your post history you'll see where I came to your defense about living on a boat.

a reply to: jrod

a reply to: raymundoko

I do not remember and do not have the time to dig through posts for information that may or may not be there. It just seems like you are intentionally being obtuse here.

It took me all of a minute to write the specs about my last boat, so it really is not asking for much to simply posts the specs of a solar powered boat you claim to have, or even demonstrate you are competent in terms of the degree you claim to hold.

It seriously seems like you post here only to derail the thread.

Do you agree with the OP and there is no global warming and no ice loss?

I fully believe we are warming.

I fully believe we are losing our ice.

I fully believe man contributes.

My views have never changed.

a reply to: jrod

a reply to: raymundoko

Your posts allow your message to come across.

Strange, then, that you have totally failed to understand it, in spite of frequent repetitions.

Tell me, is a government that charges for air not tyrannous?

Since 'using' air usually means putting carbon dioxide into it, no, I certainly don't think so. Why should we let greedy, selfish, irresponsible freeloaders pollute the public well?

What about state sponsored genocide?

Yes, what about it?