It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Metallicus
I grew up in the Presbyterian church, but left it before I turned 18. I found your post informative as I did not know the fundamental differences between these two philosophies of Christianity. While I no longer follow the Christian faith I still find theological history and discussion to be interesting.
Thank you for the information!
originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: WarminIndy
Calvinism and Tulip sound like something out of a cult where they believe only 144,000 will ever go to heaven... LOL
This completely absolves any responsibility. Either you have a winning ticket at birth or you don't. No choice in the matter. Ridiculous.
Jacobus Arminius seems to follow the standards of the remnant church.
originally posted by: WarminIndy
A lot of people think that Westboro Baptist represents all of Christianity, it does not, because they have their own fundamental doctrines that are supported solely within their church. And don't think all Christians think in such hard lines, they do not.
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: WarminIndy
A lot of people think that Westboro Baptist represents all of Christianity, it does not, because they have their own fundamental doctrines that are supported solely within their church. And don't think all Christians think in such hard lines, they do not.
Wesboro was Calvinist
www.godhatesfags.com/wbcinfo/tulip.html
We believe -- and vigorously preach -- the 5 Points of Calvinism! Anyone preaching otherwise is a Hell-bound false prophet, a messenger of Satan, to whom we
and I have met many Calvinist ministers/people who think non calvinists are hell bound, not chosen because they dont believe reformed doctrine
Oh just so you know I am not reformed, not a Calvinist, not a robot
originally posted by: WarminIndy
originally posted by: Metallicus
I grew up in the Presbyterian church, but left it before I turned 18. I found your post informative as I did not know the fundamental differences between these two philosophies of Christianity. While I no longer follow the Christian faith I still find theological history and discussion to be interesting.
Thank you for the information!
You were a Presbyterian, so you just might be predestined even though you don't follow Christianity. Most Presbyterians believe in TULIP, so you are good to go, you just might be the elect, even if you don't follow it.
But then again, you might not be elect, only God knows.
There really is no way to tell while you are on earth.
To meet the "conditions of love", God exercises "general rather than specific sovereignty, which explains why God does not prevent all evil".[32]
(32,33) John Sanders, The God Who Risks: A Theology of Providence (InterVarsity, 1998), 268
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: WarminIndy
A lot of people think that Westboro Baptist represents all of Christianity, it does not, because they have their own fundamental doctrines that are supported solely within their church. And don't think all Christians think in such hard lines, they do not.
Wesboro was Calvinist
www.godhatesfags.com/wbcinfo/tulip.html
We believe -- and vigorously preach -- the 5 Points of Calvinism! Anyone preaching otherwise is a Hell-bound false prophet, a messenger of Satan, to whom we
and I have met many Calvinist ministers/people who think non calvinists are hell bound, not chosen because they dont believe reformed doctrine
Oh just so you know I am not reformed, not a Calvinist, not a robot
originally posted by: wasaka
a reply to: WarminIndy
I thought you were being sarcastic, but your
pithy comment sharked my thought process.
Just made a few edits.
Perhaps you can dig into what I wrote and
we might flesh out a few new thoughts.
Yes I am aware Wesboro are not representative of the church.
originally posted by: WarminIndy
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: WarminIndy
A lot of people think that Westboro Baptist represents all of Christianity, it does not, because they have their own fundamental doctrines that are supported solely within their church. And don't think all Christians think in such hard lines, they do not.
Wesboro was Calvinist
www.godhatesfags.com/wbcinfo/tulip.html
We believe -- and vigorously preach -- the 5 Points of Calvinism! Anyone preaching otherwise is a Hell-bound false prophet, a messenger of Satan, to whom we
and I have met many Calvinist ministers/people who think non calvinists are hell bound, not chosen because they dont believe reformed doctrine
Oh just so you know I am not reformed, not a Calvinist, not a robot
Westboro does not represent all of Christianity. While there might be some who do agree with Westboro, I do know a church that does, Westboro seems to take a very much more fundamental approach.
And Fundamental and Independent Baptist churches teach that each individual church is its own authority.
The very foundation of the matter should if believed ,cause one to disregard all other attempts by said person to elaborate any further on all matters . If said foundational were true then what is the guiding principal that follows ? My personal experience with Calvinism did anything but build me up and was actually quite un-edifying .
1: Man is so totally depraved that he cannot seek God on his own, therefore God does the seeking based on foreknowledge and predestination. God has predestined some people to go to heaven and some to hell.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: WarminIndy
There is great historic irony in the fact that the Church of England is officially Calvinist- Articles of Religion XVII. Even had a delegation at the Synod of Dort.
To me, the great flaw is that extreme Calvinism tends to get legalistic in its analysis of the way God works, thus reintroducing the same stubborn human fault which Paul and Luther were trying to combat.
I watched some of the discussions on that site and finally decided that it was not really for me . My comment was that when the 70 had returned and reported that there was another group that didn't belong to our group , the Lord said leave them be . If they are not against us then they are for us . Far too often we see one group waging a kind of war about another .That is not what Christ was teaching us to do .
After I had to read the required material attacking Mormons and Jehovah's Witnesses and then attacking Pentecostals, I refused to take it any more. It is one thing to point out error, it is quite another to attack mercilessly under the guise of theology.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
a reply to: WarminIndy
No, Henry VIII would not have been a Calvinist. Timing's wrong.
He was a straightforward Catholic, apart from the minor detail of disobeying the Pope.
The Protestant Reformation, and therefore Calvinism, came to the church through Edward VIII and Elizabeth when they succeeded him.
I'd have to check, but I think the 39 Articles are from Elizabeth.
It was Laud who was responsible for starting the reaction against Calvinism.
www.reformedreader.org...
O let one object fix your eye and one theme fill your mind—Christ and His salvation. Absorbed in the contemplation and study of these two points, you may safely defer all further inquiry to another and a more advanced stage of your Christian course. Remember that the fact of your predestination, the certainty of your election, can only be inferred from your conversion. We must hold you firmly to this truth. It is the subtle and fatal reasoning of Satan, a species of atheistical fatalism, to argue, “If I am elected I shall be saved whether I am regenerated or not.” The path to eternal woe is paved with arguments like this. Men have cajoled their souls with such vain excuses until they have found themselves beyond the region of hope!
But we must rise to the fountain by pursuing the stream. Conversion and not predestination, is the end of the chain we are to grasp. We must ascend from ourselves to God, and not descend from God to ourselves, in settling this great question. We must judge of God’s objective purpose of love concerning us, by His subjective work of grace within us. One of the martyr Reformers has wisely remarked, “We need not go about to trouble ourselves with curious questions of the predestination of God; but let us rather endeavor ourselves that we may be in Christ. For, when we are in Him, then are we well: and then we may be sure that we are ordained to everlasting life. When you find these three things in your hearts, repentance, faith, and a desire to leave sin, then you may be sure your names are written in the book, and you may be sure also, that you are elected and predestinated to eternal life.” Again he observes, “If thou art desiring to know whether thou art chosen to everlasting life, thou mayest not begin with God, for God is too high, thou canst not comprehend Him. Begin with Christ, and learn to know Christ, and wherefore He came; namely, that He came to save sinners, and made Himself subject to the law, and a fulfiller of the law, to deliver us from the wrath and danger thereof. If thou knowest Christ, then thou mayest know further of thy election.” And illustrating his idea by his own personal experience, he says, “If I believe in Christ alone for salvation, I am certainly interested in Christ; and interested in Christ I could not be, if I were not chosen and elected of God.”
In conclusion, we earnestly entreat you to lay aside all fruitless speculations, and to give yourself to prayer. Let reason bow to faith, and faith shut you up to Christ, and Christ be all in all to you. Once more we solemnly affirm that, conversion, and not predestination, is the doctrine with which, in your present state of inquiry, you have to do. Beware that you come not short of true conversion—a changed heart, and a renewed mind, so that you become “a new creature in Christ Jesus.” And if as a poor lost sinner you repair to the Savior, all vile, guilty, unworthy, and weak as you are, He will receive you, and shelter you within the bosom that bled on the cross, to provide an atonement and an asylum for the very chief of sinners. Intermeddle not, therefore, with a state which you can only ascertain to be yours by the Spirit’s work upon your heart. “Your election will be known by your interest in Christ; and your interest in Christ by the sanctification of the Spirit. Here is a chain of salvation; the beginning of it is from the Father; the dispensation of it through the Son; the application of it by the Spirit. In looking after the comfort of election, you must look inward to the work of the Spirit in your heart; then outward to the work of Christ on the cross; then upward to the heart of the Father in heaven.” Oh, let your prayer be “God be merciful to me a sinner,” until that prayer is answered in the assurance of full pardon sealed upon your conscience by the Holy Ghost. Thus knocking at mercy’s door, the heart of God will fly open, and admit you to all the hidden treasures of its love.