It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
the water evidence and topography suggest an ocean that covered quite a bit of the planet and that was over a kilometer deep. there are articles on that from a month or so back.
originally posted by: alienjuggalo
a reply to: stormbringer1701
This makes me think of that ats thread saying all the water on earth would fit in a a ball the size of one of our states
I can't realty remember the size of the ball or even the thread but I know it's here somewhere
It just shows if there is enough to cover the whole planet with a meter then there could easily have been very deep oceans with a lot of dry land
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: intrptr
I think that the information provided above is more recent, and that maybe the rover was at the wrong place. This article is talking about glacial belts and might be a completely different thing. Yes?
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Jonjonj
a reply to: intrptr
I think that the information provided above is more recent, and that maybe the rover was at the wrong place. This article is talking about glacial belts and might be a completely different thing. Yes?
So fresh water glaciers on Mars, okay. (rolls eyes). Is there a lake, too with palm trees and fruit?
The clue is they say "equivalent" of this much fresh water ice-- if they refine it, separate it, melt it, filter it, put it in a glass…
originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: stormbringer1701
This image was created to show how Mars would have looked a couple of billion years ago , it was created using topographical data collected by the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter .
I see no need for the sarcasm.
The reason that Mars has such a thin atmosphere is Mars does not have a magnetic field like Earth does and thus has no magnetosphere. Because Mars does not have a magnetosphere, the solar wind and cosmic radiation can attack the atmosphere directly and "burn" it off.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Jonjonj
I see no need for the sarcasm.
I did. Unless water ice is trapped in other ice or below ground on Mars it will evaporate and escape to space. It is mixed with other elements, "glaciers of fresh water ice" don't exist on Mars. Not like we know they do here.
Scientists that need support for their exploration budgets tell you this. That and "possible life" are the carrots dangled before the public all the time.
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Jonjonj
I see no need for the sarcasm.
I did. Unless water ice is trapped in other ice or below ground on Mars it will evaporate and escape to space. It is mixed with other elements, "glaciers of fresh water ice" don't exist on Mars. Not like we know they do here.
Scientists that need support for their exploration budgets tell you this. That and "possible life" are the carrots dangled before the public all the time.
But the article clearly states that the glacial water ice is under a thick layer of dust, which has impeded evaporation.
That the ice has not evaporated out into space could actually mean that the thick layer of dust is protecting the ice. The atmospheric pressure on Mars is so low that water ice simply evaporates and becomes water vapour. But the glaciers are well protected under the thick layer of dust.
Read more at: phys.org...
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: Jonjonj
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Jonjonj
I see no need for the sarcasm.
I did. Unless water ice is trapped in other ice or below ground on Mars it will evaporate and escape to space. It is mixed with other elements, "glaciers of fresh water ice" don't exist on Mars. Not like we know they do here.
Scientists that need support for their exploration budgets tell you this. That and "possible life" are the carrots dangled before the public all the time.
But the article clearly states that the glacial water ice is under a thick layer of dust, which has impeded evaporation.
But doesn't' go not to say how much of the 'ice' in 'glacier like' formations is in fact water ice.
That the ice has not evaporated out into space could actually mean that the thick layer of dust is protecting the ice. The atmospheric pressure on Mars is so low that water ice simply evaporates and becomes water vapour. But the glaciers are well protected under the thick layer of dust.
Read more at: phys.org...
Mars is to small to retain an atmosphere that "could" resemble the earth in that pic. Thats why Mars looks like it does.
Except I don't think there would have been anything green on that planet.
Not according to NASA , Mars could and probably did resemble that picture for a billion or so years.