It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: BlueMule
I don't see your point. I don't even know who Sam Harris is so, if I fit into the atheist-on-the-street category, then there is one reason.
originally posted by: BlueMule
Ok, sorry if I'm not making my point clear.
Both atheists and religious fundamentalists are taking the wrong approach to world religion and myth. They need to meet in the middle, because both are half-wrong.
New Atheism is a social and political movement in favour of atheism and secularism promoted by a collection of modern atheist writers who have advocated the view that "religion should not simply be tolerated but should be countered, criticized, and exposed by rational argument wherever its influence arises."
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: BlueMule
I don't see your point. I don't even know who Sam Harris is so, if I fit into the atheist-on-the-street category, then there is one reason.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
But honestly, why should I meet anyone in the middle on these issues?
originally posted by: daskakik
originally posted by: Gryphon66
But honestly, why should I meet anyone in the middle on these issues?
I agree but BM said something about reaching our potential as a species.
Yeah, I'm not sure what that means either.
originally posted by: InTheLight
How did I allow myself to become involved in this thread?
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: Gryphon66
Well, I did say that I agree with you, I was just reposting the reason given.
Like I said in a previous post, I see a bit of bias because division amongst the religious population is recognized, and the ones signaled out are the fundamentalists, but when we have tried to point out that atheists are not a monolithic group, we are told that that just can't be.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: InTheLight
How did I allow myself to become involved in this thread?
You wanted to honestly try to relate to others who pretended to want an honest and open discussion?
Don't feel rained on.
originally posted by: daskakik
a reply to: CaptiNimble
His reply, in short, is that since 9/11 he feels that it is important to generate an international opposition to theocracy. The reason being that these monotheistic religions seem to want, more than anything, the destruction of this world.