It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
First they came for your unions (not true, they came for freedom of the worker to choose if they want to be in a union). Then they came for your pensions (this needs further explanation). Then they shipped your jobs overseas (because corporate tax rates and union demands and insurance demands create a horrifically expensive work environment in America).
Then for those they couldn't ship overseas, they cut hours(response to Obamacare mandates), kept wages unlivably low (this is hyperbole...it's okay to have to work more than one job when you don't have the education or skills to be viable with one), and cut benefits (remember, "benefits" are perks, not mandated necessities from an employer...well, used to not be, anyhow), or made you work longer and harder for less money (nobody "makes" anyone work for any hours or any wage...don't like your job, find a new one).
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: ~Lucidity
Well, you've done something for your opinion on the topic, but really nothing for me. You rant about these evil corporations, but you neglect to see the "why" (or, at least, discuss it constructively) behind this:
First they came for your unions (not true, they came for freedom of the worker to choose if they want to be in a union). Then they came for your pensions (this needs further explanation). Then they shipped your jobs overseas (because corporate tax rates and union demands and insurance demands create a horrifically expensive work environment in America).
Then for those they couldn't ship overseas, they cut hours(response to Obamacare mandates), kept wages unlivably low (this is hyperbole...it's okay to have to work more than one job when you don't have the education or skills to be viable with one), and cut benefits (remember, "benefits" are perks, not mandated necessities from an employer...well, used to not be, anyhow), or made you work longer and harder for less money (nobody "makes" anyone work for any hours or any wage...don't like your job, find a new one).
Italicised parts are my contribution, obviously.
Your OP is full of ideology, opinions, and some misinformation. Like I said, this post has only done something for your opinion--which is fine--but just don't pretend like you've presented all sides of the story.
ETA: Like KrazyShot said, it's just lacking an opposing viewpoint.
www.opensecrets.org...
Political CONTRIBUTIONS
$17,118,262
LOBBYING
$61,985,000
REVOLVING DOOR
76 out of 103 Wal-Mart Stores lobbyists in 2013-2014 have previously held government jobs.
originally posted by: SlapMonkey
a reply to: ~Lucidity
Well, you've done something for your opinion on the topic, but really nothing for me. You rant about these evil corporations, but you neglect to see the "why" (or, at least, discuss it constructively) behind this:
originally posted by: Aleister
That's what happens when people allow unions to grow weaker. The "War on Unions" run by the Republicans and their major funders (I call them "the Kochs") undercuts everyone, union member or not. Going after workmen's comp? Thieves an crooks, picking your pocket from the right and the left. Wanting to further disembowel their workers - the people who make them what they are - reveals mindsets which, while corporate in nature, probably contain some form of mental illness and a pathological lack of empathy.
originally posted by: smirkley
Correction... Unions allowed unions to grow weaker when they stopped properly representing. Lots of people began to dislike unions when they began to discover the self serving attitude the unions began to take. Sure the companies allowed that sentiment to foster. That isnt heir fault.
But someone point me to something the unions did en masse' to benefit their members more recently.
You know, something that didnt help the company shut down facilities or help cause massive layoffs.