It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: MasterOfTheDamned
my first thoughts too.
WOW, a mass of super heated plasma churning so viciously that it periodically ejects part of it's mass at high speed isn't completely silent, really?
Really. Within the gas of the star itself, I'm sure there's sound. Out in space away from the star, not one bit.
originally posted by: MasterOfTheDamned
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: MasterOfTheDamned
my first thoughts too.
WOW, a mass of super heated plasma churning so viciously that it periodically ejects part of it's mass at high speed isn't completely silent, really?
Really. Within the gas of the star itself, I'm sure there's sound. Out in space away from the star, not one bit.
If a tree falls in the woods and no one is around to hear it does it still make a sound?
From my understanding sound is vibrations, just because those vibrations have no medium to propagate away from their source does that mean they don't exist?
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: moonweed
Astrophysicist Dr Fiorella Terenzi already experimented with this kind of thing..
Well, again, it's one of those things that sounds appealing but it's not quite as billed.
Her records had nothing at all to do with sound from other galaxies, since none can reach us through a vacuum, and certainly even if space transmitted sound as well as air, it would never reach us before the end of the Universe.
What she did was make some arbitrary transform between radio signals and sound, and rendered radio noise as something you could hear acoustically.
eta: NASA does this sort of thing a lot, it confuses the hell out of people. But I suppose it is an attempt to make what you're doing more understandable to taxpayers in that case, or to make some spending money in Terenzi's case.