It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A new state law in Wisconsin goes into effect on April 1 that allows police to collect DNA samples from people who have been convicted of misdemeanors, and those who are suspects, but have not been convicted of a crime.
Under current Wisconsin law, every convicted felon has to submit a sample of their DNA (via swabbing the cheek), regardless of the relevancy or non-relevancy to their conviction.
Wisconsin authorities claim the DNA samples will only be taken from suspects when there is probable cause in serious cases, and if the suspects are not convicted, then the DNA samples are supposed to be destroyed after one year.
originally posted by: mysterioustranger
a reply to: Anyafaj
Hi Again Anyafaj...same here fro about 10 years in Michigan. Awhile back they began to do that if you were arrested. They cross referenced old cases unsolved with case-evidence in cold cases using the DNA for blood, semen, skin samples, hair etc....
Again as I said before....another way to keep tabs on us...this one...though seemingly violating a persons rights...seems like a good idea for solving cold cases.
MS
originally posted by: Ultralight
a reply to: Anyafaj
Recognize America anymore??
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Anyafaj
I really have no problem with my DNA on file . Years ago here in Australia the govt attempted to get the Australia card up and running . I believe it had your DNA and fingerprint details aas well as DOB address etc . Personally i was all for it but it failed to get passed . Perhaps one day as part of your licence . Break the law its either walk or drive and get caught .
You dont break the law and there is nothing to worry about .
originally posted by: Eunuchorn
Now if we could just get them to actually process all those rape kits sitting in storage....
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Anyafaj
You dont break the law and there is nothing to worry about .
originally posted by: StoutBroux
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Anyafaj
You dont break the law and there is nothing to worry about .
Dumb and forgotten laws in Australia:
If you're in Victoria and you're not an electrician and you change your lightbulb, you're a criminal.
In Queensland, taxis are required by law to carry a bale of hay in the boot of the car.
In Brisbane, you must sweep the footpath outside your home daily before 8:30am or face a $5,000 fine, with an increase of $500 for each additional day.
Those are examples of ridiculous laws and shows how easy it is to be criminal........ and get your DNA confiscated.
Are you a criminal??????
originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Anyafaj
You dont break the law and there is nothing to worry about .
The problem isn't about you breaking the laws or not, but the authorities breaking the laws. Planting evidence on innocent people is common place for NY cops for example. Your DNA could be switched out for evidence and then your innocent butt will be up the creek. You'll be made guilty with the power of absolute scientific DNA proof if they are having trouble finding the real perp. That BS about having nothing to hide is only as good as the cops are honest.
originally posted by: Ettenurb
originally posted by: MichiganSwampBuck
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Anyafaj
You dont break the law and there is nothing to worry about .
The problem isn't about you breaking the laws or not, but the authorities breaking the laws. Planting evidence on innocent people is common place for NY cops for example. Your DNA could be switched out for evidence and then your innocent butt will be up the creek. You'll be made guilty with the power of absolute scientific DNA proof if they are having trouble finding the real perp. That BS about having nothing to hide is only as good as the cops are honest.
To add: What if a Wisconsin State Senator does not agree with a bill and is speaking out against it. Let's say the Senator's nephew was held with probable cause in a "serious case", dna was taken and the nephew was later acquitted. How difficult would it be for a political opponent with the right connections to threaten convicting the Senator's nephew of a different crime, they did not commit, if the Senator does not change their stance on the bill? Made possible because the nephew's dna is on file.
In essence, the will of the people can be subverted because someone who was innocent has their dna in the hands of the state for a crime they did not commit.
In the words of Dolly, the first cloned sheep, "This is ba-a-a-a-ad"
Masters is getting sympathy from an unlikely source: Drew Curtis, who is running to be Kentucky governor as an independent candidate. He suspects Masters could have been set up by a competitor, but admits he has no proof.
“I’ve seen no evidence of political dirty tricks, but it seems strange that police would drive around looking for missing library books,” Curtis told HuffPost.
]
If you're in Victoria
In Brisbane
In Queensland
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: Anyafaj
You dont break the law and there is nothing to worry about .