It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And that woman in this video has a valid point, why were they not arrested for promoting child pornography?
Anyway this guy is a disgusting pig for trying to justify it by saying it's okay if the girl acts mature, freaking pig scum.
originally posted by: earthling42
a reply to: dragonridr
We live in 2015 now.
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: thesaneone
Anyway this guy is a disgusting pig for trying to justify it by saying it's okay if the girl acts mature, freaking pig scum.
Back in those days it was common for girls to marry at a young age mainly because people didn't live as long as they do now.
originally posted by: thesaneone
originally posted by: buster2010
a reply to: thesaneone
Anyway this guy is a disgusting pig for trying to justify it by saying it's okay if the girl acts mature, freaking pig scum.
Back in those days it was common for girls to marry at a young age mainly because people didn't live as long as they do now.
But we are not in those days anymore and this guy is saying it's okay if the girl is mature, he actually says it was okay and he is not the only sick person who thinks like that.
originally posted by: PorteurDeMort
I can't believe anyone could make excuses for these scum. If she acts mature? Are you kidding me? Sick individuals.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr
If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: PorteurDeMort
I can't believe anyone could make excuses for these scum. If she acts mature? Are you kidding me? Sick individuals.
You'll find people will support anything anti western culture on here, when they are not cheering Putin, making excuses for radicals or leveling the racist card any chance they can get while attacking all things Jew related. It's a circus.
The guy has a whole book stand of hadiths and is heard stating (if she acts mature).
Obviously Muslim.
Oh oh, red flag.
No matter what sick perverted crimes he promotes, he gets a pass.
We have been told how Britain was centuries ago.
Told this is a Muslim hit piece, what about the old bastards hitting on children with millions of dollars worth of publications and support apparatus behind it all to propogate it? Every book on his stand is a hit piece against humanity.
Fingers were pointed at Mormons. Then over at Catholics.
Anything to avoid the sick bastard in the video and the Islamic message being propagated.
The final trump card will fall soon. He we be declared non Islamic not representing Islam and misusing the texts.
That will make it all better.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr
You didn't answer my earlier question.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr
If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr
You didn't answer my earlier question.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr
If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?
Simple no its wrong they go to jail if I was in 1300s I'd expect a dowry probably a horse I like horses.do you realize hiw stupid your question is?? Let me ask you a question do you think it's ok to cut someone's head off and stake it to a castle wall ?? How about a lord that requires before you can get married he can sleep with your wife?? We can play this game all day and alot of sick things happened in Britain. So as they say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Mohammad did nothing other people were not doing at the time to use that to attack a religion is wrong.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr
You didn't answer my earlier question.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr
If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?
Simple no its wrong they go to jail if I was in 1300s I'd expect a dowry probably a horse I like horses.do you realize hiw stupid your question is?? Let me ask you a question do you think it's ok to cut someone's head off and stake it to a castle wall ?? How about a lord that requires before you can get married he can sleep with your wife?? We can play this game all day and alot of sick things happened in Britain. So as they say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Mohammad did nothing other people were not doing at the time to use that to attack a religion is wrong.
The simple answer is they want to do what Mohammad did back then, today.
You cannot use the "it was what they did back then" defense because they want to do that stuff today and use the past to justify it. Today it is against the law. It is immoral. It is disgusting.
You are all about peoples rights? What about the rights of todays little girls to not be violated?
originally posted by: sayzaar
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
originally posted by: dragonridr
a reply to: Bloodydagger
Wow she's a bigot. In the middle ages girls could marry at 12.
You don't see that as being wrong? If a 12 year old married and had sex with a man in his 40s or 50s? (example)
Its wrong, period.
That lady was no bigot, she was speaking the truth.
Condone this form of pedophilia then you might as well condone ALL pedophilia. Its all the same. History be damned.
Wasn't pedophilia back than our values have changed what was acceptable than we consider wrong now. And just so you know I wasn't talking about Muslims when I said girls could marry at 12. Age of consent was between 6 and 8 depending on the area this was Brittish common law so that woman can attempt to throw stones however her relatives did 5 he same thing.
We can't try to place our values on people that lived 100s of years ago things change laws change. By age 12 girls could marry and immediately started trying to have kids since mortality rates were so high. Child bearing years were considered between 12 and 18. So she wasn't telling the truth she attacked that poor man's religion because she believes her beliefs are superior. And i take it back a he's not a big got she's a racist.
PS thus is nothing more than a Muslim hit piece they should be ashamed you aren't going to change people beliefs by attacking them. This is a sad testimony on our society.
You sound like an utter moron ! Trying to follow what you have written is very difficult because i think you border on being illiterate !!
I guess your low IQ may have something to do with backward views.
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr
You didn't answer my earlier question.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr
If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?
Simple no its wrong they go to jail if I was in 1300s I'd expect a dowry probably a horse I like horses.do you realize hiw stupid your question is?? Let me ask you a question do you think it's ok to cut someone's head off and stake it to a castle wall ?? How about a lord that requires before you can get married he can sleep with your wife?? We can play this game all day and alot of sick things happened in Britain. So as they say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Mohammad did nothing other people were not doing at the time to use that to attack a religion is wrong.
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr
You didn't answer my earlier question.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr
If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?
Simple no its wrong they go to jail if I was in 1300s I'd expect a dowry probably a horse I like horses.do you realize hiw stupid your question is?? Let me ask you a question do you think it's ok to cut someone's head off and stake it to a castle wall ?? How about a lord that requires before you can get married he can sleep with your wife?? We can play this game all day and alot of sick things happened in Britain. So as they say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Mohammad did nothing other people were not doing at the time to use that to attack a religion is wrong.
The simple answer is they want to do what Mohammad did back then, today.
You cannot use the "it was what they did back then" defense because they want to do that stuff today and use the past to justify it. Today it is against the law. It is immoral. It is disgusting.
You are all about peoples rights? What about the rights of todays little girls to not be violated?
Well that's a stupid argument isn't it. Though I'm not against the idea that means we need to ban the bible and the Torah as well. Sadly can't stop there though they may get the wrong idea reading history books so we probably need to get rid of those too. Oh wait ya know someone might get the wrong idea watching movies hmm guess we need to get rid of those to. Please tell me you aren't serious and just didn't think this all the way through.
Banning exposure of things just because you think someone might get the wrong idea does nothing but diminish our society. But hey let the book burning commence who said we changed since the middle ages.
PS girls today do have protection in most countries now if you want to deal with the ones that don't fine but leave the poor Muslims in London alone they are just trying to support there family and abide by the laws. If he molests a girl lock him up simple. But to accuse him of doing something based off his religion is wrong. You think we would have learned that ftom Hitler don't you think.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: dragonridr
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr
You didn't answer my earlier question.
originally posted by: Bloodydagger
a reply to: dragonridr
If you had a 10-12 year old child and some adult in their 50s sexually molested them, how would you react?
Simple no its wrong they go to jail if I was in 1300s I'd expect a dowry probably a horse I like horses.do you realize hiw stupid your question is?? Let me ask you a question do you think it's ok to cut someone's head off and stake it to a castle wall ?? How about a lord that requires before you can get married he can sleep with your wife?? We can play this game all day and alot of sick things happened in Britain. So as they say people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Mohammad did nothing other people were not doing at the time to use that to attack a religion is wrong.
The simple answer is they want to do what Mohammad did back then, today.
You cannot use the "it was what they did back then" defense because they want to do that stuff today and use the past to justify it. Today it is against the law. It is immoral. It is disgusting.
You are all about peoples rights? What about the rights of todays little girls to not be violated?
Well that's a stupid argument isn't it. Though I'm not against the idea that means we need to ban the bible and the Torah as well. Sadly can't stop there though they may get the wrong idea reading history books so we probably need to get rid of those too. Oh wait ya know someone might get the wrong idea watching movies hmm guess we need to get rid of those to. Please tell me you aren't serious and just didn't think this all the way through.
Banning exposure of things just because you think someone might get the wrong idea does nothing but diminish our society. But hey let the book burning commence who said we changed since the middle ages.
PS girls today do have protection in most countries now if you want to deal with the ones that don't fine but leave the poor Muslims in London alone they are just trying to support there family and abide by the laws. If he molests a girl lock him up simple. But to accuse him of doing something based off his religion is wrong. You think we would have learned that ftom Hitler don't you think.
The sick bastard openly states "if they act mature" referring to sex with underage girls. This is what his religion has taught him.
We do not ban the teaching of slavery in history, your argument is destroyed. We do not have open slavery markets and it is not banned from history books. Exposure is not banned.
No need to ban the bible qaran torah or anything else. The teachings of what is in them must fit with modern society not the other way around, bending society to ancient ways and customs.