Clinton Doom Porn

Sorry folks, no pink bits in this story, just political and ethical stupidity by the looks of it.

Ethics Go Out the Door as Clinton Foundation Accepts Foreign Funds

Clickify Here For Linkification

When Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State under President Obama, she and husband Bill decided it would be best if the Clinton Foundation rejected financial gifts from foreign countries. Now, it appears they have lifted that sensible ban.

Seems like a reasonable enough thing to do right. Wrong, apparently.

Instead of publicly announcing the decision, the Clintons accepted these outside gifts quietly. It was up to the Wall Street Journal to do a bit of digging to break the news.

And here is the line up of some of the donors so far;

Among the Clintons’ new donors are the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Australia, Germany and Canada's Foreign Affairs, Trade, and Development, which openly promotes the Keystone XL pipeline.

Bloody hell, those pesky trouble making rabble rousing Australians are at it again.

But worst of all;

Another donation that could raise eyebrows comes from the Qatari government committee preparing to host the 2022 soccer World Cup, which gave between $250,000 and $500,000 last year. Human rights groups have claimed that over 1,000 migrant workers have died in the process of constructing the infrastructure to host the tournament.

The question being asked, and rightly so is, have the Clintons just time-bombed their own campaign. At the end of the day when people are putting up their hand to run, arguably, the worlds largest and most aggressive country, should they not have higher ethical standards than this ? or doesn't it really matter any more because the politicians in the US are not the ones actually running anything anymore ?.

Kind Regards
Myselfaswell

You're looking for ethics when Hillary Clinton is involved?

You'll find bigfoot first,my friend.

All to do with Synarchy...


& no doubt linked to the CFR...




There is nothing ethical about this, even when putting this story to the side.

a reply to: myselfaswell

originally posted by: myselfaswell
[...]or doesn't it really matter any more because the politicians in the US are not the ones actually running anything anymore ?.

Of course politicians still run things... like the obedient chaffeur they are... for their employers.

Your politicians are acting exactly as they are supposed to - in an Oligarchy.

The people, on the other hand, are NOT acting as they are supposed to (even obliged to) - in a 'democratic' society.

originally posted by: abe froman
You're looking for ethics when Hillary Clinton is involved?

You'll find bigfoot first,my friend.

Yeah..it would be like looking through the republican party for the same thing..not going to find it..

originally posted by: Onslaught2996

originally posted by: abe froman
You're looking for ethics when Hillary Clinton is involved?

You'll find bigfoot first,my friend.

Yeah..it would be like looking through the republican party for the same thing..not going to find it..

What is an aspiring politician to do with the system the way it is? It usually costs so much money to win an election of significance, if one is not independently wealthy (and willing to spend their own money to win), they are pretty much forced to grovel for money.

I find the idea of pulling random qualified individuals from the phone book for voluntary service in Congress and the Senate fascinating, imagine what could be achieved.

The problem with that is, without Masonic control of both parties, it would be a disaster. Remember the government shutdown from a couple of years ago when the budget barely passed? Based on my knowledge of the system and the situation at the time, without Masonic control of both parties, the shutdown would have led to a disastrous situation in the USA.

For example, if the shutdown would have continued, EBT cards wouldn't have been funded after a short time. That almost definitely would have led to mass looting and potential societal breakdown. And that's just one thing of course. As the shutdown continued, more and more government services would have shutdown over time leading to unimaginable problems.

My conclusion is that the current system in the USA almost has to be fake in order for it to continue. If you had representatives in both houses voting their true conscious rather than being Masonic controlled, the entire system would collapse in short order.

First I would like to say every and any article that ever discuss's old Hilldog could and should be considered doom porn!!

Lol!!

In all seriousness this is no surprise, there are no rules in the game of Demonazi/Republifascist, the puppet masters made that clear with the Citizen's United ruling.

My hope is that 2016 is so painful that even the most hardened sheep will be forced to face the hard reality that has been built up around them!

a reply to: ColCurious

Agreed.

I'd like to think this sort of thing is just an aberration that is limited to the US and that this will change soon because people in the US are sick of it.

Unfortunately I think this sort of thing is the result of a world wide disease of unstoppable corporatisation.

Kind Regards
Myselfaswell

"We the people" did not do our part.

We were supposed to band together and take back our country about a hundred years ago when the government banded together with the banksters to rob us blind

I guess we forgot.

a reply to: myselfaswell

It is a global disease.

It is absolutely stoppable.

a reply to: myselfaswell

YOU SEEM CONFUSED???

The "Clinton Foundation" tagline...

We convene businesses, governments, NGOs, and individuals to improve global health and wellness, increase opportunity for women and girls, reduce childhood obesity, create economic opportunity and growth, and help communities address the effects of climate change.

www.clintonfoundation.org...

It is an INTERNATIONAL CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION...and NON-PROFIT.

While Hillary Clinton held office (Sec. of State) she rightly made the voluntary decision to cease foreign donations to the Non-Profit to avoid any claims of impropriety.

When she left office...The foundation...which she doesn't profit from...again opened up donations to the international community..

If she is elected to office again...she will likely immediately cease the Foundations acceptance of foreign funds..

Just like Presidents place their investments in blind trusts while in office...

What is mysterious or confusing?

Edit to add: Just clicked your TeaParty link, which explains it...it's not confusion, it's the same old willful ignorance + spin/BS.

a reply to: Indigo5

You seem to be confused on what a "Non Profit" is and are crazy to think that the foundation does not cover any of the Clintons "expenses".