It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Flatfish
a reply to: SkepticOverlord
The truly sad part is that more than likely, most of his republican constituency in Mississippi would agree with his statements. Off the record, of course.
And its ok for a black congress person on any level to advocate for their race in just about any fashion but don't let a white legislator complain about whites subsidizing the larger part of black education.
blog.gulflive.com...
JACKSON, Mississippi -- Despite strong state standards, Mississippi students are not catching up to the rest of the nation, ranking last in a school performance evaluation released Thursday.
originally posted by: HUMBLEONE
"Stupid white men"? How about your racist comment? Lets just say racism knows no bounds. Yeah this politician is a racist moron. So whats your excuse OP?
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Flatfish
a reply to: SkepticOverlord
The truly sad part is that more than likely, most of his republican constituency in Mississippi would agree with his statements. Off the record, of course.
And its ok for a black congress person on any level to advocate for their race in just about any fashion but don't let a white legislator complain about whites subsidizing the larger part of black education.
Personally, I don't think a white legislator should be complaining about whites subsidizing black education. Especially seeing how it was "whites" who actually passed legislation making it illegal for anyone to teach a black person to read or write in our nations formative years.
.
originally posted by: Urantia1111
Dear Indigo5,
No, but third graders tend to grow up eventually. My comment was a response to some guy speculating whether the US would be better off without blacks. I'm assuming he's taking into consideration the crime statistics and dependence on government assistance associated with that particular ethnic group vs their contribution or benefit to the country.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: Urantia1111
Dear Indigo5,
No, but third graders tend to grow up eventually. My comment was a response to some guy speculating whether the US would be better off without blacks. I'm assuming he's taking into consideration the crime statistics and dependence on government assistance associated with that particular ethnic group vs their contribution or benefit to the country.
OK Then...
Which might lead to the question of why are African Americans disproportionately suffering economic depression/oppression in this country...which leads to a more accurate debate IMO about the socio-economic effects and multi-generational consequences of an entire race in the United States having been segregated, disenfranchised and oppressed as long as they were.
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Flatfish
a reply to: SkepticOverlord
The truly sad part is that more than likely, most of his republican constituency in Mississippi would agree with his statements. Off the record, of course.
And its ok for a black congress person on any level to advocate for their race in just about any fashion but don't let a white legislator complain about whites subsidizing the larger part of black education.
Personally, I don't think a white legislator should be complaining about whites subsidizing black education. Especially seeing how it was "whites" who actually passed legislation making it illegal for anyone to teach a black person to read or write in our nations formative years.
.
This trail would end up not a the door step of "conservative" white folks but black and white liberal educators who have been in charge of black education and curriculum for years now.
originally posted by: Logarock
And naturally blame would have to be distributed to the blacks themselves. Most notably black parents. After all its been 50 years now since the "Great Society" has been in full machination. Billions have been poured into the effort and still after 50 years "whitey" is indicted even though the educational process itself has long been out of the hands of anything that could be considered conservative.
originally posted by: JustACoincidence
originally posted by: TonyS
originally posted by: Rocker2013
a reply to: SkepticOverlord
I disagree that the situation is becoming worse. This is generally the generation that grew up with massive bigotry and racism in the southern states (and elsewhere) and it is diminishing on the whole.
Just look at ignorance in general, it is declining. There will always be backwater sh*t holes where lack of education and religious delusions are still creating an indoctrinated youth, but these are always diminishing. Even in fifty years there will still be some places where the level of intelligence is far lower than the national average.
Societies are moving on, they are evolving, and cretins like this man are becoming an extreme minority.
I have to agree with you; as this generation of OWM, "Old White Men" dies off the situation could and should get far better for the majority of the country. Demographics is destiny and latest stats I heard were to the effect that "whites" will be a minority group by 2030 with no one group representing a racial majority. How long that will last, I don't know.
That is going to be such a hostile environment for white people. It's amazing how fast white people are becoming a minority in their own countries.
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: Urantia1111
Dear Indigo5,
No, but third graders tend to grow up eventually. My comment was a response to some guy speculating whether the US would be better off without blacks. I'm assuming he's taking into consideration the crime statistics and dependence on government assistance associated with that particular ethnic group vs their contribution or benefit to the country.
OK Then...
Which might lead to the question of why are African Americans disproportionately suffering economic depression/oppression in this country...which leads to a more accurate debate IMO about the socio-economic effects and multi-generational consequences of an entire race in the United States having been segregated, disenfranchised and oppressed as long as they were.
We would have to ask here why many West Africans come to the US with such a command of the English language as a product of the most humble educational conditions compared to ours? In many cases their early education was conducted with chalk boards only, in what is near the equivalent to the old american one room school house.
originally posted by: OrphanApology
a reply to: Hoosierdaddy71
Yeah I gotta agree with this.
I was home schooled and all of our materials put together cost less than 100 bucks per year(not counting my mother's free labor of course).
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Flatfish
a reply to: SkepticOverlord
The truly sad part is that more than likely, most of his republican constituency in Mississippi would agree with his statements. Off the record, of course.
And its ok for a black congress person on any level to advocate for their race in just about any fashion but don't let a white legislator complain about whites subsidizing the larger part of black education.