It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
but with todays tech it would be much safer to do it the ole fashion way mixed with todays monitoring tech.
one could likely get more data for less money too.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: deadeyedick
but with todays tech it would be much safer to do it the ole fashion way mixed with todays monitoring tech.
one could likely get more data for less money too.
What "monitoring tech" would that be.
A crystal ball that says a cosmic ray of 17Tev will strike right there at 15:31 GMT on February 21st?
There is no court case.
It is a lawyers job to present such evidence to courts and they did not create the info but are representing it in court.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
If there is no danger then why deflect from the info presented by making the claim underhandedly that it could not be true because a lawyer said it.
Plans for resuming the RHIC experiment are being made and there is some reason to think this next run will present elevated risk. Collisions will be run at a low-energy level, and physicists consider this mode of operation to be more likely to produce strangelets.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: deadeyedick
BTW, here's that piece the attorneys wrote:
Plans for resuming the RHIC experiment are being made and there is some reason to think this next run will present elevated risk. Collisions will be run at a low-energy level, and physicists consider this mode of operation to be more likely to produce strangelets.
www.ibtimes.com...
The LHC is going for high energy levels. So, no worries.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
This comes with a possibility that earth could be compacted to the size of a football field.
originally posted by: Bedlam
a reply to: deadeyedick
Again, the Earth is constantly struck with proton cosmic rays with velocities all over the spectrum, from less than LHC will use to billions of times more.
No strangelets.
No black holes.
No doom.
This thing has produced tempatures hotter than the sun.
Are you sure?
That is nothing ordainary and is not found naturally anywhere on earth.
What's five times hotter than the sun and capable of sending a DeLorean back to the future?
Yep, the answer is a bolt of lightning, which can reach temperatures of roughly 30,000 kelvins (53,540 degrees Fahrenheit). The sun, on the other hand, is eclipsed in this case — its surface temperature is just 6,000 kelvins (10,340 degrees Fahrenheit).
hotter than 4 trillion degrees seems a bit hotter than what you mention.
One of the world’s most powerful particle accelerators, which is capable of generating particles hotter than four trillion degrees Celsius, has come under the spotlight after experts have warned that micro black holes and strange matter could be generated.
Perhaps i should just erase jupiter or randomly wipe out colors of the rainbow?
originally posted by: deadeyedick
that little pesky matter of billions of degrees of heat produced does not seem very common.
Someone came up with the term strangelet for a reason.
really this is just a giant trash compactor set to crush earth if we make any mistakes in calculations.
Risk assessments are all well and good, but the “doomsday risk potential” of any particle accelerator is infinitesimally small, compared to the high-energy particles that are being naturally flung around the Universe and colliding with our planet every second. Our planet is bathed in high energy particles across the whole spectrum of energies; of the billions of years our planet has been in existence, if the strangelet chain reaction is real, we shouldn’t be here.
But critics — particularly those who are not experts in the field of high-energy physics — will always have the loudest voice because no matter how tiny the hypothetical risk, they will argue that if the consequence is the end of the world, that’s a real risk that we cannot ignore.
Unfortunately, over-hyping the perceived risk of disaster can also cause unnecessary worry and may, ultimately, stymie scientific breakthroughs in high-energy physics.