It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: and14263
Can we please stop with the ________ Nazi terms we use.... I think we should now use US Police State instead of nazi, seems to be more current with the times and a little fitting... So, instead of Grammar Nazi, it's now Grammar US Police State
originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: TrueBrit
I completely understand where you are coming from - and from how you put it I can agree with what you say. I do feel however that the context of information will allow me to understand the point that is being put across. I'm talking about the wheres/were's and too/to sort of things, mis-placed apostrophes etc Anything more than that would be a more heinous mistake than grammar. I don't feel spelling/grammar impacts much on the information exchange. But you are correct, it certainly could have an effect on how the meaning of the information is interpreted/perceived.
And as for the babble that gets posted on here sometimes (and other places)... I wonder if it's me being too tired to read properly but when you go back over the post there often is just nonsensical strings of words. Although these people are often within a state of psychosis or breakdown which compels the babbling.
originally posted by: and14263
So do the world a favour Grammar Nazis and ask yourself a question, the answer to which lies deep inside your psyche: "Why am I so up tight about grammar? Why do I feel I should take the high ground over grammar? Why do I punish people publicly over their grammar?"
i cudunt care les how ppl get the info acros jus so long as the info keeps cummin
Quit the cheap shots - is it all you've got?
originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: kelbtalfenek
Why is it IMPORTANT?
Why should it be RESPECTED?
Grammar and language evolves - if you want to show respect then you have 2 options.
1 - Go back to the oldest record of our language and grammar, the PURE stuff even before Chaucer and use this - keep its integrity. I guess you are aiming to keep the integrity?
2 - Look at how language and grammar has changed and realise that instilling uptight grammar Nazi views is halting the natural evolution of language and grammar. Who says what we use now is better or worse than the completely different English used 200 years ago or the English that will be being used in 500 years.
Maybe teach your kids how to use their brain and adapt rather than instilling unchangeable rules?
(I sound like I'm beasting a bit - it's not a beast directly at you - sorry for the CAPS I just couldn't be bothered to press the italics button)
originally posted by: kelbtalfenek
originally posted by: and14263
A common shot at people on the internet and within forums (has to be said, not so much here - which is nice) is the pointing out of people's bad grammar.
This is a cheap shot. You're basically bad mouthing a person's education and I bet that if you asked the bad-grammarian how they feel you would get one of the following answers:
So do the world a favour Grammar Nazis and ask yourself a question, the answer to which lies deep inside your psyche: "Why am I so up tight about grammar? Why do I feel I should take the high ground over grammar? Why do I punish people publicly over their grammar?"
i cudunt care les how ppl get the info acros jus so long as the info keeps cummin
Quit the cheap shots - is it all you've got?
Actually I care about grammar because it was how I was raised. I was taught that good grammar is important. I was taught that good spelling is important. I was taught that the written word is the highest form of communication, and it should be respected.
If I ever have children I will stress this upon them as well. Grammar is important. Spelling is important.
originally posted by: bjarneorn
a reply to: and14263
Just for the heck, as we're talking grammar here. I'd like to point out, that it isn't "bad grammar". As grammar can't be bad ... it's not going to punch in the face. It's "poor" grammar, meaning it's "lacking".