It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: deadeyedick
labcoats= priestly garments
study of source material
houses of science=churches
there is so much likeness the only part i see missing is prayer to hawking and others but i imagine some do it
Ah well thanks so much for proving that to me, noone had ever put it like that before.
People saying they won't bother to try and correct me, but why has noone tried?
hundreds of cultures... huge flood... grand canyon would be made in weeks instead of millions of years... fossilisation would occur... why is this idea dismissed out of hand, without presenting any logical argument?
You people are very arrogant
originally posted by: Dem0nc1eaner
a reply to: Noinden
Micro and macro evolution are scientific terms though they weren't invented by creationists! They were indeed weasel words, for evolutionists to assert something unobservable, extrapolated from something observable. Who's changing the goal posts now?
And sorry, who's bible? And what does my faith have to do with evolution anyway? I actually have no religion and I don't think it takes faith to believe in an intelligence behind creation, I think it's self-evident. But if you add enough numbers, sure you can make anything possible.
I find it funny, the amount of effort everyone has put in to try and mock me, when if evolution was so evident, so true and so proven, surely someone would have been able to easily explain it with fewer words.
Unless I've missed it, there has been not one response that has tackled what I've asked, and this is indicative of the attitude of every other evolutionist I have encountered so is it any wonder there are people who find it hard to believe.
I call it a philosophy because it has no useful product for humanity. It's purely a matter of interest.
originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: Dem0nc1eaner
This someone who proved the grand canyon could be carved out in weeks ... did they show their evidence to peers to review? Nope. Its not possible.
originally posted by: ScepticScot
a reply to: OperationBlackRose
Or you could try looking at non creationist web sites.