It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
DENVER — In a closely watched court case with potential national implications, Colorado's highest court is considering whether an employee can be fired for using marijuana outside of work.
DISH Network in 2010 fired call-center worker Brandon Coats after he tested positive for marijuana. Coats, who is partially paralyzed and uses a wheelchair, says he never hid his off-duty medical marijuana use from his bosses. Instead, he argues, his three years of outstanding performance show he was a responsible worker who used pot nightly to help control seizures and spasms.
DISH argues Coats violated the company's zero-tolerance drug policy, and says he was treated no differently than an employee who showed up drunk. The two sides made oral arguments before the Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday.
Part of the problem is that detectable levels of marijuana can remains in a user's system for more than a month after consumption, long after the intoxicating effects have passed. If the state Supreme Court upholds lower court rulings, it could strip away any protections workers may have for using a legal substance in Colorado.
Coats brought his lawsuit against the company under Colorado's lawful off-duty activities law, which specifically says employers cannot fire people for doing something legal on their own time. The law originally protected cigarette smokers, among others, and predates the state's legalization of marijuana.
But now Coats is asking the court to consider whether marijuana use, be it medical or recreational, is "lawful" in Colorado. A decision either way could have wide-ranging implications for marijuana users and employers across the country.
Can you fire an employee for testing positive for marijuana?
That question becomes more difficult to answer with every passing election. So far, 23 U.S. states have legalized medical marijuana, with Colorado and Washington voting to legalize recreational marijuana as well.
Many employers — especially those operating in states with these new laws — have questioned how these changes will affect their workplace drug testing policies and whether it’s still possible to promote and maintain a drug-free workplace.
Sorting through the changing laws can be confusing at times, but it’s really not as complicated as it seems. All you need is a fundamental awareness of the important facts and stats that should inform your company’s drug policy.
After the hearing, Coats' attorney, Michael Evans, said the confusion over whether federal or state law takes precedence when state voters have specifically legalized pot needs clarification. Evans asked the court to consider that Coats was working in a non-hazardous, non-executive position for a Colorado-based company, and that no one ever accused him of being impaired on the job.
"We're getting very confusing and mixed messages from everywhere," Evans said. "We know this is not going away. We need to get this clarified. Let's not put our head in the sand, and (let's) deal with this reasonably."
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
While marijuana is legal in Colorado, companies are still firing people over zero tolerance drug policies over marijuana use, both recreational and medical.
1.) Police Unions: Police departments across the country have become dependent on federal drug war grants to finance their budget. In March, we published a story revealing that a police union lobbyist in California coordinated the effort to defeat Prop 19, a ballot measure in 2010 to legalize marijuana, while helping his police department clients collect tens of millions in federal marijuana-eradication grants. And it’s not just in California. Federal lobbying disclosures show that other police union lobbyists have pushed for stiffer penalties for marijuana-related crimes nationwide.
2.) Private Prisons Corporations: Private prison corporations make millions by incarcerating people who have been imprisoned for drug crimes, including marijuana. As Republic Report’s Matt Stoller noted last year, Corrections Corporation of America, one of the largest for-profit prison companies, revealed in a regulatory filing that continuing the drug war is part in parcel to their business strategy. Prison companies have spent millions bankrolling pro-drug war politicians and have used secretive front groups, like the American Legislative Exchange Council, to pass harsh sentencing requirements for drug crimes.
3.) Alcohol and Beer Companies: Fearing competition for the dollars Americans spend on leisure, alcohol and tobacco interests have lobbied to keep marijuana out of reach. For instance, the California Beer & Beverage Distributors contributed campaign contributions to a committee set up to prevent marijuana from being legalized and taxed.
4.) Pharmaceutical Corporations: Like the sin industries listed above, pharmaceutical interests would like to keep marijuana illegal so American don’t have the option of cheap medical alternatives to their products. Howard Wooldridge, a retired police officer who now lobbies the government to relax marijuana prohibition laws, told Republic Report that next to police unions, the “second biggest opponent on Capitol Hill is big PhRMA” because marijuana can replace “everything from Advil to Vicodin and other expensive pills.”
5.) Prison Guard Unions: Prison guard unions have a vested interest in keeping people behind bars just like for-profit prison companies. In 2008, the California Correctional Peace Officers Association spent a whopping $1 million to defeat a measure that would have “reduced sentences and parole times for nonviolent drug offenders while emphasizing drug treatment over prison.”
originally posted by: DeepImpactX
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
While marijuana is legal in Colorado, companies are still firing people over zero tolerance drug policies over marijuana use, both recreational and medical.
It's still a company's prerogative to have a drug policy in place. Nicotine is a legal drug. If a company says it will fire someone over nicotine use, they have the legal right to do so. It would be stupid, but they can do it.
Coats brought his lawsuit against the company under Colorado's lawful off-duty activities law, which specifically says employers cannot fire people for doing something legal on their own time. The law originally protected cigarette smokers, among others, and predates the state's legalization of marijuana.
originally posted by: LDragonFire
At the federal level companies like DuPont, Monsanto, the lumber industry, paper industry, big oil and pharmaceutical industry will all fight against any legalization, these industries will be affected the most by any kind of federal legalization.
DuPont and Monsanto was apart of the original industries that backed criminalization/prohibition there chemicals are required to grow cotton among other crops that depend on there chemicals to grow. Pot doesn't require any chemicals, you plant it and walk away till you harvest. This will cut into these chemical companies bottom line.
The lumber and paper industries would be completely be rebuilt, the lumber industry would be almost eliminated as most lumber is used to make paper, with dioxin as one of the chief pollutants. The paper industry would quickly switch to hemp as a cheaper source for the fibers needed to make paper.
Big oil would also see a decline in profits as pot based lubricants and bio fuels would be so much cheaper to produce.
Pharmaceutical companies would also see reduced profit as medicines using a plant that so far hasn't been patented would greatly compete with there products.
We will see how long the people's will, will be hampered by these mega industries and there lobby groups.
Coats brought his lawsuit against the company under Colorado's lawful off-duty activities law, which specifically says employers cannot fire people for doing something legal on their own time. The law originally protected cigarette smokers, among others, and predates the state's legalization of marijuana.
originally posted by: filosophia
In most cases, zero tolerance means zero intelligence. If they wanted to be fair they should fire anyone who grabs a beer on a Friday night. Or they could not treat employees like slaves. This guy was hardly operating heavy machinery.