It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Baddogma
Well we have the common dna markers of every other (well, except for one or two...maybe) organism on Earth... but that doesn't preclude the possibility that:
A) the original dna was placed here ... and grew everything we see... or
B) that already existing apelike homonids were "tweaked" with alien genes (maybe this galaxy was seeded with similar dna? Who knows) and semi-smart apes all of a sudden were confronted with their own mortality, could figure out patterns and project results of manipulations... and went crazy.
Putting two and two together, meaning it sure seems like we have interaction with some high tech society from somewhere... and I primarily mean the technology seen flying around here since...forever... along with those anomalies about humans... we ARE relatively fragile creatures unsuited in a few ways to our environment ... with those two hints (at the least... there are others), I'd say it's quite possible we are/were an experiment ...of sorts.
originally posted by: stuthealien
im gonna save my breath on this one, i tried discussing it with darwin evolution theory supporters,they can not think outside the box and just spew text book lies at you over and over ,there completely brainwashed and are like religous fanatics .also i doubt darwin was as intelligent as some modern mankind/woman as we have instant learning resources.
there are big holes in darwins theory and i will never buy it till i see a dog give birth to a horse
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: Tichy
I certainly could be mixing up any number of things... I am guilty of that all the time. However, I just think it is a possibility we are the result of outside manipulation... hardly a certainty.
I am, however, almost certain that there is a presence here of an intelligence we are unfamiliar with... whatever it's actual nature is (and origins are) I have no idea, but it does seem to be of a higher technological ability than we currently have.
Putting that (personal) fact together with human's singular nature makes me go "hmmm...," but I'm open to the notion being wrong.
ETA and I forgot to include the whole reason I replied, in that you are exactly right about incredible wonders of the natural world right in front of us all the time... true, we don't need 'space people' for wonder... nevertheless, they seem to be here.
originally posted by: maxzen2004
Is there another animal on Earth that needs artificial clothing to survive? What other animal uses clothing? Why would we shed our fur if we ever had any? I have a hard time seeing how we fit in, the only thing I see saving us is our intelligence and luck.
I understand we can survive without clothes but why are we not born suited to our environment like other animals?
I am just writing this see what everyone's thoughts are, there so many unknowns. I am just curious if anyone feels the same way, ATS has some incredible people and I am looking forward to the responses.
originally posted by: tetra50
Great thread topic. I often wonder that we take humanity apart, genetically, as you have in your OP, wondering about our suitability….when, logically, we must consider the possibility that our environment has been manipulated….perhaps, to become more antithetical to our survival.
Why? To destroy us? To challenge us, maybe…..
The point I'm really trying to make, here, is it's just as likely we've both been manipulated: our species, and our environment…..
tetra50
originally posted by: stuthealien
a reply to: gortex
evolution if it ever happened would still be present in monkeys today and we would still see the apes/monkeys in different stages,but we do not why ?
originally posted by: Tichy
originally posted by: tetra50
Great thread topic. I often wonder that we take humanity apart, genetically, as you have in your OP, wondering about our suitability….when, logically, we must consider the possibility that our environment has been manipulated….perhaps, to become more antithetical to our survival.
Why? To destroy us? To challenge us, maybe…..
The point I'm really trying to make, here, is it's just as likely we've both been manipulated: our species, and our environment…..
tetra50
I would rather keep it with Arthur C. Clark and believe, that we were "supported", not manipulated .
originally posted by: tetra50
Great thread topic. I often wonder that we take humanity apart, genetically, as you have in your OP, wondering about our suitability….when, logically, we must consider the possibility that our environment has been manipulated….perhaps, to become more antithetical to our survival.
Why? To destroy us? To challenge us, maybe…..
The point I'm really trying to make, here, is it's just as likely we've both been manipulated: our species, and our environment…..
tetra50
originally posted by: tetra50
a reply to: Tichy
Yeah, but who is watching those "watchers and deciders?"
Cause I'm not so sure they've got anyone's best interests in mind, though they might say they do…..
And appreciate your thoughts, truly, but your lack of punctuation and quotations makes your thoughts seems like mine. Hmmm. What is that telling us, I wonder?
tet
originally posted by: stuthealien
a reply to: Tichy but if you watch the same documentary do you see the twelve skeletons provided by evolution theorists walking round swinging from trees???????????????????????????????????????????????????????
you took one snippet of my post out of its context