It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: jazz10
No its NOT a religious Civil War.
Thats what those pulling the strings want you to think it is so you will all play ball.
A blind man sees no difference in skin colour or religion as a deaf man hears no difference in tongue giving an indication of location.
People need to start and wake and wake now.
Even military personnel are getting played off against each side while the mongers shake hands and secure deals with each ither.
There will be a sign
originally posted by: Cuervo
with our actions, we are breeding extremists. Stop shooting them and hand them books, internet, and teachers. In 20 or 30 years, we would be a much different world.
originally posted by: HumansEh
originally posted by: Cuervo
with our actions, we are breeding extremists. Stop shooting them and hand them books, internet, and teachers. In 20 or 30 years, we would be a much different world.
That's the real problem Cuervo, the radicalized extremists will fight books and education more fiercely than all the bullets and bombs you could hurl at them.
At its essence lies control, using religion (by force and intimidation) to keep populations in mental chains. It is pure thought control. Nothing more.
Are suicide bombers mainly Imams?
No chance!
Some poor sap trying to impress in a man made piety competition.
A medieval patriarchal society suits egotistical power hungry men. It has been embedded in the minds of Islamic nations since bloodthirsty warlords realised how imposing divinely ordained rules kept people from thinking too much and accepting the status quo.
This is why breaking the mental bindings would be more difficult than all out war.
In agreement with what you said but its the more difficult option sadly.
Religion - retarding humanity for millennia.
originally posted by: TDawgRex
If it is not a religious civil war, than what is it?
These two sects of Islam have been trading blows centuries before NATO, the US or EU, Corporations, etc, etc.
originally posted by: gladtobehere
Being the "world's policeman" is the cover story fed to the masses.
And who exactly are we "policing"? The US is now openly arming, training and funding Al-CIAeda/ISIS, the same guys we're supposed to go fight...
The primary reason why Western governments (predominantly the US) are continually assassinating/overthrowing leaders, installing dictators, creating radicals, attacking, invading and occupying countries in the ME is because of natural resources.
originally posted by: DarknStormy
originally posted by: TDawgRex
If it is not a religious civil war, than what is it?
To understand what that poster is talking about you need to have some Islamic knowledge. Though it may seem that these wars are motivated by religion, they aren't. What we have are a bunch of thugs who use the Islamic label with the help of Western funding and weapons. One thing that Islam is against is taking Non-Muslims as allies. ISIS, even Al-Qaeda have done this in the past and recently. The Qu'ran actually states that if you take Jews and Christians as Allies, you become one of them. Islam disowns these types of people and therefore ISIS should not be labelled as Islamic.
These two sects of Islam have been trading blows centuries before NATO, the US or EU, Corporations, etc, etc.
That is the problem. There shouldn't be two sects of Islam and this has only played into the hands of the elite. So both sides who engage in fighting over what could be considered a disagreement about interpretation etc probably deserve to be slaughtered because they cannot uphold the 5 pillars of Islam in harmony amongst each other. They have been corrupted, both sides.