It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: g146541
a reply to: MarlinGrace
Nice avoidance there, will you answer the question?
Is the quality of life OVERALL better than it was 30 years ago?
originally posted by: seabag
originally posted by: chiefsmom
How about we put our big boy pants on, and do what we need to do, to live the way we want to live?
Way back when, I had to have 2 jobs, to make due, with the extras I wanted.
And today? A co worker has taken a second job. She can live on this one, but needs some extra to pay for a surprise expense.
What is so wrong with that?
Or, just get on welfare. Then you can afford the newest phone.
Exactly.
Instead of talking about "living wages" how about you go earn one!!
Nobody should be led to believe that work done at an entry level position, such as McDonalds or a Walmart cashier, somehow rates a "living wage". Just because you show up and do a little work doesn't mean you get a new car, house, 401K, etc. It takes more than that, children. Time to face reality!
But I will shop elsewhere and do my best to keep revenue local.
LOL
I simply suggest that if a corporation gets the honor of being the one with a stranglehold on the American economy, maybe now and then they could at least give us a reach around or something.
You know I love you baby, you don't have to be so rough!
I’m 40 and very much in the peak of my earning potential…I’m long from retirement.
I can see that if you can look back 30 years, you must be retired or close to it, this is why your quality has gone up.
I think these problem are a result of government policies and a culture that breeds laziness and dependence rather than rewarding hard work and self reliance.
My quality is up to ehh maybe the same, I don't want or need for anything I guess is the most important thing, but I am retired too and do not have to compete for slave wages in a non existent job pool. These problems did not start with BarryO however, they were in motion waaay back even before BillyC's NAFTA.
I am still unclear if the video would be considered a strawman though.
Good chat though.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: MarlinGrace
I've seen a large amount of charitable organisations start up on the net.
Why doesn't someone start an on-line charity (start with Walmart) and simply state that if you think the minimum wage is not enough, put your money where your mouth is.
This charity will then allow Walmart employees to take from it what they need. All those who complain about the poor wages can then feel good that they are providing for people that cannot provide for themselves.
originally posted by: Rezlooper
I'm heading to Walmart in a little bit, I'll be one of the first to try this (even though I find myself one of those on the side of needing an extra ten dollar bill once-in-a-while.)
How confident are you that the employees at the local stores you frequent (instead of Walmart) are any better off than the employees at Walmart? Have you talked to them? What are their wages and benefits in comparison?
LOL
While I agree in principle, I do not feel any corporation owes anyone anything. I don’t take handouts and I don’t feel entitled to someone else’s profits.
originally posted by: g146541
a reply to: MarlinGrace
Good answer then!
So with your business, being an entrepreneur you can and did support yourself!
I applaud you.
But your tools were stolen you say, maybe the thief got laid off as well and he turned to crime??
It is possible.
How will your business do nowadays that there are not enough paying customers to support your business though?
We are all in a loop that is the economy, no customers means cannibalization, then death.
Sure I'm doing OK, but I no longer have to compete, my kids might not be able to say the same.
We are all in this loop together, and corporations are putting the finishing move on us.
Best hang together or we will surely hang in a walmart brand graveyard.
originally posted by: Nyiah
originally posted by: Rezlooper
I'm heading to Walmart in a little bit, I'll be one of the first to try this (even though I find myself one of those on the side of needing an extra ten dollar bill once-in-a-while.)
I can tell you right now, fat chance in it leaving your hand. It's a yer-ass-is-gone firing offense at most jobs these days to accept a tip. Take the Publix grocery chain here in FL. They have a policy to have the baggers offer to escort the customers with their full carts to the customers' cars. **Edit** I should also note that it is required of the baggers to offer to load the groceries into the cars, also. Big honkin' signs plaster up front stating in a nutshell, "Tipping is not accepted, please don't." Of course these baggers do it when asked, but cannot accept tips no matter what (cameras are everywhere, would you risk it?) What makes it even worse in my neighborhood is that the majority of the employees are elderly people (70, 80+) trying to supplement their retirement. A lot of them can barely move from the bagging end. I've complained several times in emails and to the managers that at the very least, the baggers running cartloads out to the cars should be allowed small tips. I've heard the "I understand, but I really can't do anything about it, it's corporate's decision" line so many times. THAT is the problem. They don't get a say in whether or not their store can allow tipping, it's the jack-offs in the main offices. Take that into consideration before you tempt someone to risk their job for $10 bucks.
originally posted by: MarlinGrace
There have been several threads, some claiming taxpayer sponsored wages. Some claiming minimum pay is all employees will ever get. Well it occurred to me for all you people who think they are not paid enough, probably union officials. There really is an easy solution, the next time you buy your happy meal or check out at Walmart reach in to your pocket and give the cashier a 10 dollar bill. Tell them to divide the money up among other employees to help with their cost of living.
This would make you proactive instead of waiting for government or corporations to create a livable wage for employees. This solves both sides of the argument, they get what they deserve, and the customer, you, get to pay for. If everyone does this, money will flow freely into the pockets of employees everywhere and the problem is solved.
Of course it will get interesting when the store video is watched to see who spread the 10 dollar bill around, and how many claimed the money on their taxes.
originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: MarlinGrace
All those who complain about the poor wages can then feel good that they are providing for people that cannot provide for themselves.
originally posted by: seabag
a reply to: g146541
I think the video cleverly illustrates a point that many overlook, especially those who support higher wages for entry level positions…and that point is…the 'extra money' to pay these wages comes from somewhere, and it CERTAINLY won’t be from the pockets of the fat cats on the Board of Directors. NOPE!!! It will be added to the cost of goods and we’ll all pay it!
originally posted by: NoRulesAllowed
Is your logic there simply that you think this is a real "brilliant" solution because YOU know already you will never pay to this charity (since you yourself think the walmart pay is "ok")..but you can simply sit back in your chair and proclaim that ANYONE ELSE who has a problem with the low wage can well go to the charity and donate their money? (Something which doesn't have to faze you since you already know you personally will never pay to this charity). IF YES, then this is an idea simply borne from your own greed.