It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Rainbowresidue
a reply to: jacygirl
Fellow Canadian -Stein member reporting for duty.
I've had a couple of days to mull this over and have come up with my own theory. It's crazy - sounding, and out there, and I'd probably never tell my coworkers about it, but here it goes.
My intuition tells me that the timeline has been changed.
By those who have the technology to time travel.
This must be something on such a high security level that most probably that country's president won't even know about it.
They did this to prevent a massive genocide, or for a WWIII to break out, or whatever catastrophic event they were trying to prevent.
Their technology isn't perfect, something went wrong... and now half of us remember the changes and half of us think there never were any changes.
(Mandela, New Zealand, Berenstein-Berenstain, etc.)
Their faulty time travel project had app. half of us remembering things before the change as a side effect.
Ok, now you can all sling your tin foil hats at me.
lol
originally posted by: Boswell
a reply to: _Del_
your response was funny, but you didn't answer my question. when was the last time you picked up a Berenstain book?
originally posted by: Hayyel
originally posted by: boomerdude
This reminds me of the kerfluffle when some folks distinctly remember New Zealand being to the Southeast of Australia instead of North. Course none of the folks on the Southeast side actually lived in New Zealand.
As one of the people from that thread who are convinced that NZ *had* changed position on the map (and even though I don't live there, I was VERY well-acquainted with the country and it's positioning due to a friend who DID live there and always had me looking at the country on maps, and where it was in association with Australia...), this -stein/-stein thing is basically what we experienced, except more people are agreeing with this one than we had agreeing with us.
What frustrates me is people thinking that it just suddenly somehow changed, and older books will have the correct (what we remember) spelling. Like when they thought old maps of NZ would be different. It's not like that. If it's somehow changed now, it's somehow changed back through our history at the same time.
I still think this stuff is fascinating. I have no idea why it would have happened, but I have felt for a while now that reality isn't as stable and as fixed as it used to be.
originally posted by: _Del_
...There was also a picture of several books. One had Berenstain, one had Berenstein on the spine. Two of them had Berenstain in the title, but were part of the Berenstein Bears Cub Club collection. On the same book.
This makes me think that in the past "Berenstein" appeared in at least some of the printings. Perhaps it was a printing house error. Noone is crazy in this scenario, nor shifting realities.
originally posted by: ldyserenity
... However, this is about as good as evidence as the world maps problem. Which is to say, not good evidence at all. Because spelling and geography can be misremembered. Celebrity deaths, same thing. ..
I've came across a couple of forums where it's been suggested that the 'n' spelling might have originated from the French word 'Dilemne'... sounds very plausible except... yes you guessed it, the French word is actually 'Dilemme'... It appears that many French people are also now reporting having mistakenly been taught a silent 'n' spelling... weird?
originally posted by: Rainbowresidue
a reply to: oblvion
Yes, it would be nice if we could pick TheOneElectric's brain.
He did gives us kind of a warning that if we dig deeper, soon they'd know.
(If I remember correctly.)
I also think there are other members here, that could share their thoughts,and I'd be glad to listen.
Sled where are you?
originally posted by: Soylent Green Is People
originally posted by: _Del_
...There was also a picture of several books. One had Berenstain, one had Berenstein on the spine. Two of them had Berenstain in the title, but were part of the Berenstein Bears Cub Club collection. On the same book.
This makes me think that in the past "Berenstein" appeared in at least some of the printings. Perhaps it was a printing house error. Noone is crazy in this scenario, nor shifting realities.
Correct. It just seems like the common mistake was made that most people are making. And that mistake seems quite plausible because names ending in "--stein" is very common, so people assume that the authors of these books also spell their name that way.
Besides (and as you implied), if it really were a "time/reality convergence", then there shouldn't be those books where the correct spelling AND mistaken spelling both appear.
The fact that the two spellings co-exist on the same book strengthens the idea that people just made the mistake of assuming that the Berenstains spelled their name with an "e". Even the people involved in putting together those books.
originally posted by: jacygirl
I believe that there ARE people who do know the truth, and they are doing all they can to keep us manipulated into adapting and carrying on, without question.
originally posted by: Serdgiam
originally posted by: jacygirl
I believe that there ARE people who do know the truth, and they are doing all they can to keep us manipulated into adapting and carrying on, without question.
This is only partially true. There are different factions, essentially, and not all of them have such goals in mind.
Quite the opposite.
originally posted by: Kangaruex4Ewe
a reply to: jacygirl
It's right for both sides, as obviously I can see "Stain" on them now.