It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A widow was given ample notice before her $280,000 house was sold at a tax auction three years ago over $6.30 in unpaid interest, a Pennsylvania judge has ruled.
Joe Askar, Beaver County's chief solicitor, said the judge got the decision right, based on the law.
The property sold for about $116,000, and most of that money will be paid to Battisti if further appeals are unsuccessful. An attorney for the purchaser did not return a phone message on Monday.
originally posted by: Indigent
What is wrong with this people? all the militia that went to Bundy ranch should protect this house now.
why people don't riot over things like this???
The only way i see this possible is the one that make this happen had a personal grudge against the woman or her late husband, this is sick.
The property sold for about $116,000, and most of that money will be paid to Battisti if further appeals are unsuccessful. An attorney for the purchaser did not return a phone message on Monday.
So they sold the house less than half the value so she even get less of what is hers...
originally posted by: weirdguy
There is a part of the female anatomy that describes these people from Beaver County
originally posted by: thisguyrighthere
...They flat out refused to allow me to pay the debt with cash in hand because the wheels of bureaucracy had already moved on to the next step. It took a lawyer and some local political groups to stop the nonsense.
This is another reason bureaucracies are evil. Their procedures and rules trump your very existence and often times there is no recourse.
originally posted by: Indigent
a reply to: Nucleardoom
Exactly how they are going to sell a $280k dollars house for a $6.3 problem, a big mac cost me more than that, there must be more to this but come on this is just crazy. does judges think? does anyone involved is able to think?
originally posted by: mobiusmale
I don't think that your "evil" characterisation is an over-reach here. And I would even go a little further in saying that this was some form of collective evil. In order for this to go forward, it would have had to go across quite a number of people's desks...and yet none of these people said, "Hold on...what are we doing to this poor woman?".
And then...somebody issued an order for the sale...and then an auction was held...and money passed hands.
And then it went to court again...and at the end of it all a Judge said this course of action was correct.
Remind anyone of the old excuse, from another era, where people's defence of their evil actions was "I was just following orders"?
originally posted by: samkent
What I read was that it was proven in court that she ignored multiple notices of this debt.
Plus she ignored the tax sale notice of her property.
Some people are horrible at financial matters.
It was thought that her husband had taken care of most of her financial affairs before his death. She just stuck her head in the sand over the notices. Feeling they must be wrong.
The local governments have exacting steps they must follow for every debt. Be it large or small. The process is the process.
Ask yourself this:
Would you take $6 out of your pocket to pay the debt for someone who lives in a $280K house in a nice neighborhood?
originally posted by: samkent
Ask yourself this:
Would you take $6 out of your pocket to pay the debt for someone who lives in a $280K house in a nice neighborhood?