posted on Apr, 2 2014 @ 03:40 AM
Warrantless Search ? and the Issue is
Just a brief word to the folks at the NSA. Keep up the good work! To the rest of our civil servants invested in passing the time looking for a bigger,
spookier monster, just a word of advice. Terrorism exists. Did before 9/11. Still does after, and does what it does because it has no chance at
Here's the easy part, elected organ warmers. The "Surviellance" is that "Bad" part.
No "Surviellance, No need for a warrant.
But you have a "suspicion". Hey, DON'T WE ALL !
Go to a "real" judge, state your case, get a warrant. And that means if you want to go trolling in the worlds sweetest, biggest hard drive, or look at
someone's phone at the scene of an accident, all works the same way, for every person, NO EXCEPTIONS!
Sounds like a lot of work, we'll need to hire staff. Hey, we give you money, stop blowing it on Mars rovers and Egyptians!
Once more for the elected pond scum that were playing video poker.
The SURVEILLANCE is the BAD part. Do it like you used to do it. Need more lawyers? I know one, lives at 1600 Penn Ave. Him and his wife are gonna be
out of a job soon. I'm sure they'll have adequate references. They seem to know how to organize. Nice folks. Good kids. Seem a little slow on the
political uptake, but we all have our faults !
edit on 422014 by tencap77 because: Spelling