It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Wrabbit2000
reply to post by DeadSeraph
If someone is at a distance, across rough ground...(and we'll just use the distance in that video for a handy example).... No. I would not shoot them to death when they had absolutely zero chance of actually making it to me with a speed which makes the extra second to second and a half to raise my own weapon, matter.
DeadSeraph
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
Nobody has answered my question yet...
I will try again:
If you are armed, and someone comes at you with a knife and you fear for your life, would you believe yourself to be justified to shoot that person in self defense or not?
I see by the allotment of stars on this subject that my position is not the popular one, but I never cared about the popular opinion to begin with. What I care about is the truth, and I see many of you disregarding it in favor of bias.
I only wish all of you were policing our streets so that you could be put under the microscope if you happened to make a similar split second decision. The entire world would be a better place because apparently, you would all solve such situations without violence 100% of the time. Why local police departments don't recruit ATS members is beyond me. Must be the work of illuminati lizard people.
do you really think a man with a little knife would charge several automatic assault weapon cops over rocks and bolders?
He was clearly sane, knew the law, knew his rights all his did was simply not comply with a basic request, yes that was bad, but being shot multiple times with 5.56mm armor piercing bullets from several cops? what the hell?
Biigs
reply to post by DeadSeraph
My answer is simply that my judgement told me he was not violent and would not dare charge a squad of heavily armed men.
That does not mean i could be wrong, but armoed heavy assault police dotn exactly die easy and id much prefer they shot a man that tryed to attack them than one thats shot in the back simply because he disagreed with them.
Biigs
reply to post by DeadSeraph
what happened to innocent before proven guilty?
Why is a police officer not permitted to defend himself against a knife wielding assailant but YOU are?