It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BERKELEY, Calif. — Delivering a rare speech for a Republican at this bastion of liberalism, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul on Wednesday was given multiple standing ovations by the left-wing audience after railing against government surveillance and warning the students: “Your right to privacy is under assault.”
“No one should be allowed to invade your privacy,” Paul said. “That’s why I’m announcing today that when I return to Washington, I will push for a select committee styled after the Church Committee that investigated the abuses of pwoer of the intelligence committee in the 70s. It should be bipartisan. It should be independent, and wide reaching. It should have full power to investigate and reform those who spy on us in the name of protecting us.”
Added Paul: “It should watch the watchers.”
Read more: dailycaller.com...
BERKELEY, Calif. — Delivering a rare speech for a Republican at this bastion of liberalism, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul on Wednesday was given multiple standing ovations by the left-wing audience
727Sky
BERKELEY, Calif. — Delivering a rare speech for a Republican at this bastion of liberalism, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul on Wednesday was given multiple standing ovations by the left-wing audience
That really is a big deal IMO.. Big deal he was invited to speak and was able to get enough seats filled to call an audience. He has played the game much better than his father as evident by his rise in the standing of the Repub Party and is being considered a possible presidential candidate... He has been criticized and called a flip flopper etc etc but one has to enter the house before the furniture can be arranged..
eLPresidente
727Sky
BERKELEY, Calif. — Delivering a rare speech for a Republican at this bastion of liberalism, Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul on Wednesday was given multiple standing ovations by the left-wing audience
That really is a big deal IMO.. Big deal he was invited to speak and was able to get enough seats filled to call an audience. He has played the game much better than his father as evident by his rise in the standing of the Repub Party and is being considered a possible presidential candidate... He has been criticized and called a flip flopper etc etc but one has to enter the house before the furniture can be arranged..
When neocons call you a flip flopper because you really prefer not to go to war over Ukraine, I'd take it as a compliment.
chrismarco
reply to post by eLPresidente
And it means nothing...I would like it to mean something but it doesn't...they (Berkley Folks) will default to their natural born genetic code which is liberalism/socialism when it comes right down to it..
I would think that the people in Academics would think independently but time and time again they show their narrow minded way of thinking...but I do have hope that some day we will shed our Republican and Democratic scales and unite for the common good of all..
seeker1963
reply to post by eLPresidente
He definitely speaks a good game, but so did Obama.
My issue with Rand is that he voted against GMO labeling.
Sorry, but I cannot trust any government official whom feels that I don't have a right to choose what I want to eat.
He certainly is not his father and the way the Republican party treated his father, he still chooses to run as one?
Nah, I gotta pass on giving my vote to him, even though his rhetoric against the NSA gives me a woody, I still have to pass....
I am an opponent of the FDA's war on natural foods and farmers. I've stood up for raw milk, hemp and natural supplements. I fought to take power AWAY from the government on these issues. So while there is evidence we should be concerned about GMOs, we should also be careful not to lose our constitutional perspective simply because the end result is one we may desire. That's what we fight against. That's what the statists do. Take a look at a pretty thorough rundown on the recent GMO amendment. There were many more problems with it, including the potential the FDA could have assumed broad new rule making authority if this badly written amendment had passed. - Sen. Rand Paul
Learn more: www.naturalnews.com...##ixzz2wSrrbEse
seeker1963
reply to post by eLPresidente
Response appreciated.
Yea, I guess I can get that response to a point, and you did very well at describing it. Don't get me wrong, I am not against Rand, but I just cannot trust him. Just like Ted Cruz. It is hard for me to believe what he is slinging when his better half is part of Wall Street.
The blood runs thick in the aristocracy of the United States Government, (not sure about the mad experiment called Obama) but I think we as a country need all new blood! Not blood of those whom are already established families in the realm of politics, but blood of those normal people whom actually know the meaning of balancing a check book.
Rand might very well be exactly what we need as a country, but I hope you can understand my apprehension.
I try not to think too much about the Cruz/wife association to Wall St. I know Ron Paul/Rand Paul supporters who work at high levels in Wall St. and I do not question their principles at all. I'm not telling you to trust Cruz, but there are better reasons not to trust him, like his imperialistic tendencies.
seeker1963
reply to post by eLPresidente
He definitely speaks a good game, but so did Obama.
My issue with Rand is that he voted against GMO labeling.
Sorry, but I cannot trust any government official whom feels that I don't have a right to choose what I want to eat.
He certainly is not his father and the way the Republican party treated his father, he still chooses to run as one?
Nah, I gotta pass on giving my vote to him, even though his rhetoric against the NSA gives me a woody, I still have to pass....
Paul and Cruz ... I like 'em just fine where they are. If one of them had to give up their seat in the Senate to keep Clinton away from the helm, that's the only time I could get in line to vote. Not going an inch farther out on that limb than I have to.
Don't get me wrong, I am not against Rand, but I just cannot trust him. Just like Ted Cruz. It is hard for me to believe what he is slinging when his better half is part of Wall Street.
rupertg
And what it will amount to is just another career politician saying whatever it takes to get into office and the end result will be a continuation of stagnation by self neutered "leaders" who merely profit off of the backs of the American People.
We have ACTUAL career politicians who are ACTUALLY subverting the Constitution yet the guys making sense still take heat. Completely logical…