It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
President Barack Obama would veto a GOP-drafted bill that would allow legislators to take agency officials to court if they don’t enforce laws, according to a White House statement.
White House officials said they oppose the measure because it creates a paperwork burden for them.
“The vastly expanded reporting scheme required by the bill would be unduly burdensome and would place the Attorney General in the unprecedented position of having to be kept informed of and report on enforcement decisions made by every other Federal agency,” the statement said.
Reported to House without amendment (03/07/2014)
(This measure has not been amended since it was introduced. The summary of that version is repeated here.)
Faithful Execution of the Law Act of 2014 - Expands the circumstances under which the Attorney General is required to report to Congress regarding the enforcement of laws to include any instance in which the Attorney General, an officer of the Department of Justice (DOJ), or any other federal officer establishes or implements a policy to refrain from: (1) enforcing, applying, or administering any federal statute, rule, regulation, program, policy, or other law within the responsibility of the Attorney General or such officer; or (2) adhering to, enforcing, applying, or complying with, a final decision of any court of jurisdiction respecting the application of the Constitution, any statute, rule, regulation, program, policy, or other law within the responsibility of the Attorney General or such officer. (Currently, reports are not required with respect to the policies of other federal officers and reports concerning nonenforcement of a law are required only when the Attorney General or a DOJ officer refrains on grounds that the provision is unconstitutional.)
Requires such reports to state the grounds for policies of nonenforcement.
Sounds like Congress wants the AG to report to them.
In the first major test of voter attitudes in 2014, Republican David Jolly won a closely watched special election for the U.S. House in Florida Tuesday, handing his party a narrow victory in a battleground district where Republicans and Democrats spent millions of dollars fine-tuning their messages on national issues ahead of the fall midterm elections.
www.washingtonpost.com...
reply to post by xuenchen
It all boils down to the extent of selective "Executive" Privileges
And that's not a bad idea IMO.
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
This may be the first notable example in our nation's history for a President to see laws enforced AFTER he leaves office and his own executive ability to outright order his own cover-ups.
It'd take outright impeachment to slow his roll at this point.
reply to post by macman
They can't pass this.
0bama is too busy granting exemptions for the 0bamacare Law.
Holder is too busy avoiding scandals.
Can't you guys just see that this poor black man is just too busy for such things.
macman
reply to post by deadcalm
They can't pass this.
0bama is too busy granting exemptions for the 0bamacare Law.
Holder is too busy avoiding scandals.
Can't you guys just see that this poor black man is just too busy for such things.
reply to post by buster2010
Didn't take too long before somebody played the race card.
deadcalm
[...]
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
ARE WE THERE YET?
Where is that line drawn? At what point do the American people say...you have went this far...but no further?
Who among you can honestly say that you feel like the US Government even comes close to representing you....and the things that are important to the American people?
Those cornerstones of America...justice, rule of law....equality of opportunity for all?
Or was the bar simply set too high?
reply to post by Zanti Misfit
Yeah , a Constitutional Lawyer amoung Other Things......
deadcalm
Anything that brings even a shred of transparency or accountabilty to this admimistration is worth a shot....it can't get much worse.
edit on 12-3-2014 by deadcalm because: (no reason given)
reply to post by Sirrurg
If I am not mistaken, corporations are people too. They have more money than You the People and can buy any politician they want to do their biding