It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
lostbook
reply to post by Golantrevize
I'd always felt that Black Holes were in the center of Stars since they collapse in on themselves and turn into Black Holes. Light is still there, it's just inside the black hole and we can't see it. Are Neutron Stars similiar to Black Holes? Are they the same thing? I forget.
I know that in reality Stars are born in Stellar Nurseries. However, someone stated on an earlier thread that babies were developed in the womb inside out. So, maybe there is something to my idea.edit on 25-1-2014 by lostbook because: changed to make more sense
A Thorne-Zytkow object, Kip Throne and Anna Zytkow theorized back in 1975, could come to exist when a dying red giant star swallows an orbiting neutron star. The result would be, the researchers suggested, a star with another smaller star embedded in its core and which would overall resemble other known types of stars but would emit a different and unique chemical signature. Since that time, many space scientists have scoured the heavens looking for such an object—many candidates have been found, but thus far none have been confirmed. In this latest effort, the found object appears to closely resemble what Thorne and Zytkow predicted.
Read more at: phys.org...
Thanks for the sources
Grimpachi
reply to post by Arbitrageur
I am pretty sure this is the source
New discovery could be a Thorne-Zytkow object
The pics look cool but each article depicts something different.
Simplifying what you write for members is fine, but it is still nice to include a source, especially since another source in this case says additional research is needed to confirm it's really what they think it might be. You left that part out.
Golantrevize
reply to post by Arbitrageur
Told you where the idea was put forward. I am the source of what I write, may it be news or physics I simplify for ats members.
More work will have to be done before it will become known if the newly discovered specimen is truly a Thorne-Zytkow object.
It hasn't really been done because they still need to do more work to prove it, correct?
none was finally proved to be a true Thorne- Zytkow object.
But it has been done!
lostbook
reply to post by Golantrevize
I'd always felt that Black Holes were in the center of Stars since they collapse in on themselves and turn into Black Holes. Light is still there, it's just inside the black hole and we can't see it.
Are Neutron Stars similiar to Black Holes? Are they the same thing? I forget.
I know that in reality Stars are born in Stellar Nurseries. However, someone stated on an earlier thread that babies were developed in the womb inside out. So, maybe there is something to my idea.
Xcathdra
reply to post by Golantrevize
Could it be possible that we are seeing a transition from one star type to the next?
I mean science has classified star types and established what happens when a star goes from A to B to C. Have we ever actually observed / located a star that has been in transition?
How is is possible for you to state the object is proven to be a Thorne-Zytkow object when I can't find any record of anybody saying that?
Golantrevize
reply to post by Arbitrageur
How is it possible for me to leave a part out of an article I have never read?
So even at the meeting she didn't say it was proven, only that it "might qualify as a Thorne-Zytkow object".
Speaking at this year’s American Astronomical Society meeting, Hubble Fellow, Emily Levesque reported that she and her colleagues at the University of Colorado have discovered a star that just might qualify as a Thorne-Zytkow object.