Our civilization's fundamental mistake

Hello !

I found an interesting analysis about the mistakes that have lead us to the current world situation expressed here :

www.salvation-of-humans.com...

Here what it's all about :

I - The original sin reiterated, or the Myth Adam and Eve.

II - The just basis to escape the actual crisis and to found a new durable civilization.

III - What orientations must you reject ?

IV - How can you look for the right solutions ?

V - Your civilization's fundamental Mistake.

VI - Towards a just Meaning of Life.

VII - Towards Just Values.

From what I read, I totally agree with the one who wrote this.

What about you, what do you think of this analysis ?

... This website is getting more and more interesting... did anyone already knew about it ? (salvation-of-humans.com)

Best regards everyone !

RedSky

Despite the 'mish-mash' of philosophical concepts and themes, despite the distorted uses of theology, "aliens," and symbolism, and despite it's own personal-given-prespective, the overall issue(s) revolve around human morality and 'self'. The issue(s) of morality, virtues (and vices), and how they reflect and impact 'self" (as well as those around us) has been discussed quite extensively since before the Hellenistic/Greek Era's. Undoubtedly, they will further be discussed, defined, and applied.

Overall, not a bad op'd piece, and seems well meaning. Would probably be more coherent if it didn't provide so much 'mish-mash'.




seekerof

Mmm.... looks like some fairly standard "New Age"channeled material. It assumes some things that aren't correct (particularly about how reptiles were regarded around the world) and offers the "solution" that embracing a new-age Christianity in a "one world religion" will resolve everything.

It's a very simplistic view and fraught with problems.

To give you a view from another culture... would you think it was so workable if the view that was espoused New Age Islam and the blending of all the world into THAT "one world religion"?

Most probably wouldn't find that a good solution. Just because the viewpoint is Christian, I don't think it's a good or workable idea, either.

Hello Seekerof and Byrd !

Thank you for your answers !

But I think you got wrong with the Christian point-of-view...

I found this in the much bigger french version :

translate.google.com... F-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=%2Flanguage_tools

(Extract from the Google translated page)

" Introduction .
Definition of the religion.

Shinto�sme : a religion with share.

Analyze religious fact.

Let us examine the facts: the religions are a plague for humanity .

The religions are a social plague .
The religions reverse the teaching of their own writings.

The religions lie with cynicism.

The religions encourage the human ones between-to commit suicide .

The religions are fanatic and do not change behaviors.

The religions are responsible for g�nocides and indifferent to the human life.

Conclusion on the religious fact.

Further information .

How to recognize a sect , humour.

It is not necessary no for temples ! "

After reading this, I don't really think the author is the religious type...

I keep reading... It doesn't feel "New Age", it even approves hunting !

Take a look at the map for an overview of the site.

I'm thinking of e-mailing the author to see who's behind this and what his/hers intentions are...

Best Regards !

RedSky


[edit on 21-11-2004 by RedSky]

I think its bogus how as you enter the site there is a warning in which 'fragile minds may be shocked by this information'. Seems a little pathetic. Did anyone else notice how the first link on the page is a site to become a member and buy a CD to support the 'cause'? True philosphy doesnt need to be funded. Idealogy shouldnt cost money.