It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
swimmer15
reply to post by Freenrgy2
i have been in enough situations to know that in this type of situation the thought of jail never enters your mind. Had i been in this situation, i would only hope that i walk away from it. Whatever gets me to that result is what i feel i needed to do, to say what you would or wouldnt do away from it is a whole lot different than assessing and reacting while your in it.
macman
reply to post by Freenrgy2
Shoots were fired at the beginning of the incident. The attacker already established he had no issue with shooting at the victim.
Common sense shows if he is willing to fire at the start, he should have no problem shooting at the end.
The victim should be praised. The attacked should be held as an example not to try to rob people.
macman
reply to post by Freenrgy2
The attacker wasn't firing because at the moment, he was getting a wallet that didn't belong to him.
Common sense shows he was willing to shot once, twice and that he has no problem doing so again.
It will be left up to a jury, which is said because the attacker chose the life of crime, died while doing his choice and that is all that should have happened.
A turd died.
KRS 503.055(3)
(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a felony involving the use of force.
diggindirt
Please tell me how I "invented" details?
The simple fact that you did not read the full thread and get the later story means that you were unaware of the facts of the situation. How does that make my statements "knee jerk" reactions?
I'm truly sorry if I offended you but I assumed (wrongly) that you were informed to the same extent I was and were saying that driving away leaving two unarmed people to face a man with a gun was a good and proper thing to do.
1. You didn't read the entire thread before you began commenting.
2. Because you weren't informed you made rash statements that didn't take into consideration the entire real-world situation.
3. You blame the mods for the slippage in quality of posts when you are the one not taking the time to read the thread. (I posted honestly that I had read only the first 10 pages closely.)
4. Can we get an apology for your "attack" which sprang from ignorance?