It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by luxordelphi
It would just look like weather.
Then why spend money making a weapon if they can let regular weather do it for them since there is no difference between the two?
DenyObfuscation
luxordelphi
DenyObfuscation
reply to post by luxordelphi
How would we, on the wrong end of a weather experiment, be able to tell whether or not it is natural?
Don't we have plenty of people that can "Just look up"?
Very astute, Hall Monitor, because contrails persisting without proper conditions for persistence would certainly be a way to tell.
Then what are you implying here? How would/did/do you CONCLUDE a lack of proper conditions for persistence?
DenyObfuscation
reply to post by luxordelphi
Give this a look and see if it addresses the Carnicom claims you mention.
www.metabunk.org...
...see if it addresses the Carnicom claims you mention...
The metabunk site you link is full of lies and false information and dis-information.
luxordelphi
DenyObfuscation
reply to post by luxordelphi
Give this a look and see if it addresses the Carnicom claims you mention.
www.metabunk.org...
The metabunk site you link is full of lies and false information and dis-information. How do I know? When the link was first put forward from someone in your camp, I looked up some stuff on there that I do know a lot about. Kind of like reading something in the paper that is personal in some way and understanding, because of personal knowledge of an event, how false the reporting can be.
What I read, online, back then, were field notes...temperature, humidity etc. He did the leg work. I read and reaped the benefits of his, at the time, unrewarded work.
What I read, online, back then, were field notes...temperature, humidity etc. He did the leg work. I read and reaped the benefits of his, at the time, unrewarded work.
The metabunk site you link is full of lies and false information and dis-information.
So that is the point of this thread: how would we know? How could we know? What steps would help us to know? How could we, caught between the cross hairs, as it were, know??!!
luxordelphi
mrthumpy
luxordelphi
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
Ok...I'll make a list, off the top, of what I think might cause the start-stop contrail/chemtrail behavior and I'll list all the ones I can think of without prejudice to sides in that debate but first, to stay topical, I'll quote the OP link on this subject.
1. Different temperatures
2. Different humidities
3. Different particle concentrations
(The first 3 are a stretch.) (They involve some of those perfect storm conditions that you all are so fond of.)
The first three are a stretch? Seriously do you NEVER look up? You see those OTHER white fluffy things in the sky that don't come from planes? You see the gaps between those?
Outrageously persistent contrails don't make rain clouds. Keep on keeping on looking, though, and the light will come on.
luxordelphi
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by luxordelphi
It would just look like weather.
Then why spend money making a weapon if they can let regular weather do it for them since there is no difference between the two?
There isn't any difference between a disastrous weather event that was caused by natural forces as opposed to one that was caused by man's intervention? To you, there's no difference? Would it make a difference to you, do you think, if you ever found out that a supposedly 'natural' disaster that you or your family suffered in was in reality man-made or instigated?
A stressed populace is an easily controlled populace.
luxordelphi
tsurfer2000h
reply to post by Tucket
Im not claiming to have the answers Surfer, I was just perplexed as to why you would post that information when you yourself (yes im assuming that this is general knowledge) are aware that the rules of convention arent always followed.
Again this is about the weaponizing of weather not any other rules of convention.
I never said that rules aren't broken, but when talking about this topic there is no evidence showing any country has gone and broken the UN rules concerning the weather as a weapon, or that they are looking for ways to do so.
This is about the FACT that weaponized weather is the perfect weapon because no one would know. It would just look like weather.
My statement is not about assessment. It's about proper conditions for contrail persistence. That's the conclusion; not assessment.
DJW001
reply to post by luxordelphi
So that is the point of this thread: how would we know? How could we know? What steps would help us to know? How could we, caught between the cross hairs, as it were, know??!!
If you find nanobots in rainwater, that would be a pretty good clue. Also, a stationary low pressure system caused by intense microwave radiation might be another. In fact, the more knowledgeable about meteorology and science you are, and the closer you pay attention to your environment, the easier it will be for you to spot "weaponized weather," so crack those books and start learning.
How could a low pressure system be held in place by intense microwave radiation?
Don't we already have this intensity in urban areas? Or does it require more concentration? Or more direct guidance?
Anything specific regarding the refutation of Carnicom at the link?
Can you give a specific example of something on there that is false, a lie, or disinfo?
Where are those available?
Cliff Carnicom are you serious?
I see you as a prime example of an intelligent adult that has been drawn in by lies and disinformation from the chemtrail sites to the degree that you are now spreading their lies for them.
How many times have we seen you write that 15 minutes is a max for contrail persistence? Where did YOU get this information from?