posted on Oct, 6 2013 @ 08:10 PM
If you look around you, just how many people are negatively affected by the government shutdown? Most of us know at least one person, but how many of
us really know a lot of people affected by it? I mean, think about it... If you work at NASA, Lockheed Martin, Oakridge National Laboratory, and so
forth... You either found yourself getting laid off or suspended until the shutdown is over.
But there's more than just jobs that are being affected, I mean think about it. Immigration is affected, so are public services, and people are being
kicked off their own house because they live on federal land. How many resources do people rely on to survive or at least to be able to live life as
normal as they can given their disability?
What would happen if Obamacare were instated and a government shutdown would take effect? Would the hospitals still be open or will they all close?
Would only mandatory "in case of emergency" situations be treated or will no injuries be treated? Is Obamacare one of those things that will end up
threatening citizens with ultimatums in the future? Already, Obama is practically stating that if Obamacare doesn't go through no Social Security for
you. What happens if there's a gridlock in the future and instead of "no social security for you" it's "agree with us or the citizens will not
receive healthcare"?
The problem with Obamacare is that it ties into every aspect of our lives, and it has come to a point that if it does get passed, who really knows
what methods will be used to passed future laws, since Obamacare isn't strictly about socialized health coverage.
I'm certain there are many other reasons why the government is too big but my point in this thread is to give a harsh realization on the gravity of
the situation. Some people simply don't like thinking ahead and not just ahead but ahead in three-dimensions. Unfortunately, now there's a lot of
things that are happening, and could happen in a time when the government has shut down and that causes problems for Americans both inside the US and
those outside (like needing help from an embassy).
However, on the other side of the spectrum, you have a lot of people unaffected by it and they live their lives as normal. Not a single difference in
their lives have been made and they could care less if the government shuts down or not because they see no difference. That's a pretty good
situation, but also raises the question on whether or not we need the government as big as it is and why should we even re-open state parks and the
like when we could just enjoy them naturally without park rangers? Do we really need a lot of government programs? Can we just test the waters and
keep the essential? Of course, re-open things like courts, patent offices, and immigration / embassies but those would technically be considered
essential.
So what do you guys think? Do you think the government has become "too big to shutdown" or is it perfectly fine to shut it all down except the
necessities?