It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by wildespace
There isn't more of meteors than, say, 20 or 30 years ago. There are simply better measures and iniciatives to spot them and to report them.
new_here
reply to post by wildespace
There isn't more of meteors than, say, 20 or 30 years ago. There are simply better measures and iniciatives to spot them and to report them.
How on Earth do you know your first sentence is true, if your second sentence is true? You're basically saying they 'probably' missed a bunch because the detection wasn't as good as it is now. Okay. How many did they miss? Can't say? Then you can't say there has been no increase. But thanks for towing the party line! I reckon somebody has to do it!
Even if it were aimed directly at our planet, the newly discovered space rock is so small that it would likely burn up in the atmosphere before it could hit the ground.
By observing the asteroid over several days, researchers pieced together its trajectory. They also put together an animation of asteroid 2013 RZ53's path, showing that it comes relatively close to Earth's orbit.
The space rock belongs to the Apollo family of near-Earth asteroids — the same group from which the meteor that exploded over the Russian city of Chelyabinsk in February 2013 is thought to have originated. The Russian meteor was much larger than the newly discovered asteroid, estimated to have been about 56 to 66 feet wide (17 to 20 m) before it exploded.
The discovery of 2013 RZ53 was made by researchers with the Mount Lemmon Survey at the University of Arizona. The project is part of a larger, NASA-sponsored program called the Catalina Sky Survey, which scans the cosmos for potentially dangerous asteroids.
new_here
reply to post by wildespace
There isn't more of meteors than, say, 20 or 30 years ago. There are simply better measures and iniciatives to spot them and to report them.
How on Earth do you know your first sentence is true, if your second sentence is true? You're basically saying they 'probably' missed a bunch because the detection wasn't as good as it is now. Okay. How many did they miss? Can't say? Then you can't say there has been no increase. But thanks for towing the party line! I reckon somebody has to do it!
new_here
reply to post by Lady_Tuatha
Is it just me, or are these things (asteroids, comets, fireballs) popping up 'out of nowhere' these days with increasing frequency, with little or no warning. Sheesh! Thanks to the University that spotted this. No thanks to NASA for spending gazzillions sending probes all over the place, yet failing to position just one at a distance, Earth-facing, to keep an eye out for 'In-Coming!!!" Not Helpful!
Very interesting near-Earth asteroid - 2013 RZ53, has a very small relative velocity to the Earth ... 1.5-2 km/sec. Most likely man-made object or impact lunar ejecta from the surface of the Moon ... Size about few meters. If the object is natural, it's an excellent target for the mission to capture it.
wildespace
Back on topic of this asteroid, here's what Leonid Elenin posts on his Facebook:
Very interesting near-Earth asteroid - 2013 RZ53, has a very small relative velocity to the Earth ... 1.5-2 km/sec. Most likely man-made object or impact lunar ejecta from the surface of the Moon ... Size about few meters. If the object is natural, it's an excellent target for the mission to capture it.
As incredible as it may sound, it indeed can turn out to be a spent rocket stage or something like that. Such objects have been spotted before and initially thought to be asteroids.
I'm sure that, if you looked at its animated trajectory, you couldn't help but notice that it practically follows our planet, like a cat.
wildespace
Back on topic of this asteroid, here's what Leonid Elenin posts on his Facebook:
Very interesting near-Earth asteroid - 2013 RZ53, has a very small relative velocity to the Earth ... 1.5-2 km/sec. Most likely man-made object or impact lunar ejecta from the surface of the Moon ... Size about few meters. If the object is natural, it's an excellent target for the mission to capture it.
As incredible as it may sound, it indeed can turn out to be a spent rocket stage or something like that. Such objects have been spotted before and initially thought to be asteroids.
I'm sure that, if you looked at its animated trajectory, you couldn't help but notice that it practically follows our planet, like a cat.
Soylent Green Is People
reply to post by Baddogma
Many of the fireballs being reported lately have been seen on security cameras and web-cams, which have become more ubiquitous over the past few years. More cameras = more opportunities for sightings.
Obviously the Russian airburst last year was exceptional, and would have been noticed whether or not we had a lot of webcams/security cams, but that may be a relatively isolated event.