It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Kashai
reply to post by Bilder
Then why admit to actually having chemical weapons when he never did???
Kashai
reply to post by Bilder
Then why admit to actually having chemical weapons when he never did???
Kashai
reply to post by Pistoche
But in this case chemical weapons were used and to be honest there is plenty of evidence this occurred.
You see I am considering that the fact the Russians and Syrians were so quick to respond is because they realize they are at fault.
Any thoughts?
Pistoche
Kashai
reply to post by Pistoche
But in this case chemical weapons were used and to be honest there is plenty of evidence this occurred.
You see I am considering that the fact the Russians and Syrians were so quick to respond is because they realize they are at fault.
Any thoughts?
Yes, they were most definitely used in Syria, the question remains, by whom? From the evidence presented to the public, there is not enough evidence to support any claim as to which party used the chemical weapons, and if you claim to know who did it, I cannot help but concluded you're pushing an agenda. From looking at the evidence, I see no reason as to why Assad would use it knowing how the US would react. However, the US and its allies have everything to gain by claiming that Assad used it.
Kashai
reply to post by Pistoche
But in this case chemical weapons were used and to be honest there is plenty of evidence this occurred.
You see I am considering that the fact the Russians and Syrians were so quick to respond is because they realize they are at fault.
Any thoughts?
(Reuters) - U.N. human rights investigators have gathered testimony from casualties of Syria's civil war and medical staff indicating that rebel forces have used the nerve agent sarin, one of the lead investigators said on Sunday.