It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Archaeologists announced a discovery that has broad implications for the history of the Amazon: evidence of human settlements in Bolivia dating back at least 10,000 years.
International researchers came to this conclusion after discovering remnants of human activity in three mounds examined out of the hundreds that scatter the the Llanos de Moxos region in present-day Bolivia, according to the paper published this week in peer-reviewed scientific journal PLoS ONE. Inside some of the mounds was evidence apparently left by human foragers, including ancient sea shells, animal bones and charcoal. Radiocarbon dating of the soil suggests the mounds are the oldest known archaeological sites in the area.
Originally posted by punkinworks10
reply to post by punkinworks10
With all the evidence that people have been in SA for at least 20k years and as many as 40k it stuns me that the academic world still hangs tenaciously to that 13k year threshold.
What I would like to know is what kind of points they used, ad that will tell which wave that came in with, and also human remains, as the skulls would tell us a great deal.
The region of present-day Bolivia explored by researchers was previously believed to have been environmentally unfriendly to early humans, discouraging habitation. This new research proposes an alternative version of early human history in the area, however.
Originally posted by Kaboose
reply to post by SLAYER69
Well I doubt they are 10,000 years old since man was created about 6,000 years ago as is the oldest known artifacts of mankind I think are not even 6000 years old of course.
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
Curious to know if the "Clovis First" dogma still looms over the Americas? I mean, 10k......that would kinda challenge the whole notion, unless they went down to the Amazon, then up to the Desert Southwest.
Originally posted by punkinworks10
reply to post by Byrd
Hey Bryd,
I was brief in my post, but what I was getting at is, in NA at least, there is still a lot of resistance to a preclovis occupation.
With some early sites the counter claims still being made ate so outlandish as to be as bad as ancient alien theory.
, Stuart Fiedel, has turned into a crackpot himself when he suggested that the Toca da Tira Peia tools were made by capuchin monkeys.)
Originally posted by punkinworks10
Byrd ,
If you can find the time,
check out the link that was posted to Nova's "Ice age death trap",in the thread on earliest huntinge.
The first 45 minutes deal with an excavation of a ancient lake in Colorado, that yields mammoth , mastadon, bison and such going back 200,000 years.
All pretty straight forward stuff until the last 15 minutes, when they go over the front half of a mammoth, only the front half , that was buried in a peat bog, and was covered with stones.
Stones not found in the bog itself, and the cracked rib that has cut marks on it. Here's the kicker it is securely dated to 60k years ago.
Hmm 60 k!
[editby
Originally posted by Hanslune
Originally posted by punkinworks10
Byrd ,
If you can find the time,
check out the link that was posted to Nova's "Ice age death trap",in the thread on earliest huntinge.
The first 45 minutes deal with an excavation of a ancient lake in Colorado, that yields mammoth , mastadon, bison and such going back 200,000 years.
All pretty straight forward stuff until the last 15 minutes, when they go over the front half of a mammoth, only the front half , that was buried in a peat bog, and was covered with stones.
Stones not found in the bog itself, and the cracked rib that has cut marks on it. Here's the kicker it is securely dated to 60k years ago.
Hmm 60 k!
[editby
I viewed the film, two corrections the lake is 150,000 years and the clay layer was dated to 45,000
Intriguing to bad they didn't find more cut marks or stone toolsedit on 4/9/13 by Hanslune because: (no reason given)
BEIJING — Pottery fragments found in a south China cave have been confirmed to be 20,000 years old, making them the oldest known pottery in the world, archaeologists say.
The findings, which will appear in the journal Science on Friday (June 2012), add to recent efforts that have dated pottery piles in east Asia to more than 15,000 years ago, refuting conventional theories that the invention of pottery correlates to the period about 10,000 years ago when humans moved from being hunter-gathers to farmers.