LIVE Whitehouse seeking approval from Senate for attack CNN Feed

reply to post by WhiteAlice


The fact that Kerry looked like he was ready to grow horns to gore someone with & how badly he fidgeted after that exchange is rather telling. I have a feeling vote or no vote, it's going to happen one way or the other.

kerry says may put boots on ground but then later on says no

Originally posted by Nyiah
reply to post by WhiteAlice

 

The fact that Kerry looked like he was ready to grow horns to gore someone with & how badly he fidgeted after that exchange is rather telling. I have a feeling vote or no vote, it's going to happen one way or the other.

edit on 9/3/2013 by Nyiah because: (no reason given)

Pretty much. He actually kind of freaked me out a bit because he was so forceful about emphasizing that it WAS going to pass. Kerry right now is basically reminding me that politicians tend to be better orators than thinkers through the sheer number of fallacies he's committing. He just stated that "the world" agrees with this condemnation but apparently he didn't get the memo that, although the UK agrees the chemical weapons are bad, mmkay, they still voted against military action. He's really loose with his "world support".

Well Rand Paul seems to be the only sensible one there...He is for the people. Not like these greedy warmongers

Rand does.


Listening to Kerry argument was bullsnip. He is asking for permission to bomb the hell out of someone. That is an act of war.

Meaning of someone did the same thing to US. It would be WAR, and they are under the illusion that there won't be any bigger reprecussions to US interventionism ?

What an idiot.

reply to post by neo96


And what if, in the process of bombing the snot out of the target, the target chooses to retaliate? Does that not constitute an act of war? See, even though this is being presented as a limited military intervention, it could very well turn into a full blown war unless they expect Assad to be bombed without any attempt at retaliation...

Originally posted by neo96
Rand does.


Listening to Kerry argument was bullsnip. He is asking for permission to bomb the hell out of someone. That is an act of war.

Meaning of someone did the same thing to US. It would be WAR, and they are under the illusion that there won't be any bigger reprecussions to US interventionism ?

What an idiot.

Yeah, logic would dictate that raining military explosive devices down on others isn't the universal sign for "Hi, I like you! Let's be friends!" I agree, if it were us on the receiving end of that delivery, we'd declare war & unleash hell.

Here is Rand Paul owning Kerry

reply to post by WhiteAlice


No it does not. Silly boy, don't ya know that an Act of War only happens when another Country retaliates for being "punished" by the USA?

Sometimes I think the USA is no better than the Taliban. We kill kids with hi-tec weapons (instead of knives) and we continually try to force other people to believe and behave like we want them to.

*We is used to describe the US Government.

Originally posted by Mamatus
reply to post by WhiteAlice

 

No it does not. Silly boy, don't ya know that an Act of War only happens when another Country retaliates for being "punished" by the USA?

Sometimes I think the USA is no better than the Taliban. We kill kids with hi-tec weapons (instead of knives) and we continually try to force other people to believe and behave like we want them to.

*We is used to describe the US Government.

edit on 3-9-2013 by Mamatus because: (no reason given)

I have a picture on an old trojan-ruined hard drive somewhere from back in 2003 or 2004. It said "Q: What's the difference between a military, and a terrorist group? A: Not much beyond the number of soldiers." I wish I had that available, I'd make it my av in a heartbeat.


Edit: Hm, but I do have this one I could use instead

reply to post by Mamatus


That was exactly my point. If Assad should strike back, then it would be an act of war by our regard and could, thereby, effectively end that "limited" aspect of military action.

P.S. I'm a woman. "Alice".....

It's on...

Well I didnt here one shred of evidence. Kerry is like a used car sales man . Why is any evidence only for the closed session. The public demand it. This is not going to be a popular war. They need a newer pearl Harbor!!!!

reply to post by maythetruthbeknown


I've never heard so much bulls!it in all my life...

Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by maythetruthbeknown

 

I've never heard so much bulls!it in all my life...

Of course you have. Don't you recognize the patented Bush Maneuver? Lie, talk in circles, evade questions, and lie some more.

This wasn't a hearing, it was a propaganda campaign.

I have never heard such ball crap in my life before then Iraq.

reply to post by Nyiah


True but after all these years, it's especially see-through.

The thing is the general public will probably lap it up. That is the sad thing

reply to post by maythetruthbeknown


That. Was. INCREDIBLE! The only thing wrong with this video is the uploader claiming that Kerry owned Paul. Couldn't be further from the truth. The end where the general in Kerry's own words pulls the rug out from beneath him followed by bellowing laughter says it all. Wow!