posted on Mar, 21 2013 @ 02:33 PM
I think what we have here is a serious case of over-diagnosis. Autism is a catch-all diagnosis that includes several conditions and an incredible
range of level of disability across a spectrum. Some people are severely affected and are easily distinguished as autistic, however, most people who
are affected fall somewhere higher on the spectrum. Therefore, many children with development/social disabilities are grouped together on the autism
spectrum. They may not even show the most classic of autism symptoms (like difficulty socializing) but are still given an autism diagnosis.
I think this points to a larger problem with our society at large, but particularly with the public education and health care systems. If you have a
child with some kind of disability/disorder you want them to get the special attention that they need to be successful. However, your child won't be
able to get the help they need (therapy, special classes, specialists, etc.) unless a diagnosis is given. So the doctors are all too quick so slap on
whatever catch-all label is in fashion (it used to be ADD) because without it the child will receive nothing. This in turn clouds these sorts of
statistics. What you should really say is 1 in 50 people are
diagnosed with autism.
edit on 21-3-2013 by d1gov because: (no reason
given)