It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

How many Occupy's are cointelpro operations like Sydney

page: 1
4

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 9 2013 @ 09:49 PM
link   
I've been part of Occupy Sydney on and off since October 2012 I was a bit dubious of joining as my instinct did'nt trust the guy running it, I had a couple of chats with him and he was clearly lying about stuff but I decided to join after a while and I ended up living there for a month in Martin Place.

Every conversation I had with someone who came up to Occupy ended up getting interrrupted by the guy running it and after a while I would tell the people that I think the guy who is running Occupy Sydney was working for the police and to watch what you say to him and what he would do next so at least I educated a few people, now hopefully this thread will get a little bit of exposure and will stop getting people to give over their names and email addresses to be used against them at a later date.

This week I have had confirmation from a police friend of mine that it is definitely a cointelpro operation and that the police are working with the guy running it in order to collect information on the public who are against the Scum sorry elites (the government work for the elites, all they are there for is to control your mind)

So does anyone else know of an Occupy that was taken over after it was started up by someone who then takes peoples names and emails or just doesn't sit right with you?

Would be nice to throw a spanner in the cowardly ways the elites work but then thats all the elites are, nothing but the lowest forms of life on this planet.

I think Occupy Wall Street had a disclaimer on their website saying the Sydney one was nothing to do with the movement but I dont know how true that is.
edit on 9-3-2013 by jinni73 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 9 2013 @ 10:15 PM
link   
I can tell you this by personal experience and its all I can say for certain that way. When I was with Occupy STL, there were two cops in camp. They weren't there as much to spy on everyone as they were to make sure no well meaning, decent people got themselves killed in a high profile way. We were literally in the heart of St Louis and it was, itself, named Murder Capital of the United States not that many years ago.

I'm not sure to this day how many in the group knew who they were but I'll certainly say one was very low key and almost 'see-through' for not being noticeable while the other was in about the best place a camp of any kind, anywhere ever has for gossip and information central. That part I just about found humorous. I was volunteering with the Safety Committee though, so in a real sense, I had the same overall interest that they did. No one got hurt.



posted on Mar, 9 2013 @ 10:25 PM
link   
Is the Sydney one still going? Occupy what?

Sydney is the last place id ever want to occupy, bows and arrows against the lightning that is NSW's corruption hub. That was a doomed idea at the get go, that's why alot of the *real* folks bugged out in the 1st week.. One week is all it took to be heavy infiltrated, both on the ground and on FB.

I know a few folks that went "totally dark" internet wise shortly after, pulled down all their opinions left any group they were in and vanished from the fight. and the internet, i have to physically visit them to talk to them.. and they're not whack jobs.. far from it, these are some seriously critical thinkers.. the real peeps.

I was told/advised/warned shortly before to watch what i say about any *popular* movement or conspiracy, as Australia isn't the free land we believe(d) it to be. I was told well before that by old folks.. but it wasn't until Occupy that things were clear as perspex.

Obviously i've stayed well away from MP, and the movement.. heck i try to avoid Sydney like its a deadly virus.. as in many ways it is.. but i came to tell ye.. Yes, from day 1 *they* assumed command (mainly due to severe lack of any real direction.. it was piss easy apparently.. just be loud and sound like you know things.. works every time) and the very fact folks are still there.. is a warning enough that that particular party isn't run by friends.



posted on Mar, 9 2013 @ 11:57 PM
link   
lol Occupy was soooo last week broseph. Get with the times, the cool thing now is to post online about how both parties have contributed to the mess we are in. That is until we get a republican president again and then it will be all their fault once again.



posted on Mar, 10 2013 @ 12:10 AM
link   
reply to post by Xarian6
 


Yeah i know how corrupt it is over here you only have 4 people running the government, but all government is corrupt whatever country you are in.

I just think its wrong to be taking the names of people that just come up and show an interest when its put right in front of their faces.



posted on Mar, 10 2013 @ 05:52 AM
link   
reply to post by jinni73
 


I had a similar experience with Occupy Sydney. I vetted them online through Facebook and that was enough - I swung past Martin Place a couple of times for GAs, but never had any active involvement in it. My reasons for keeping at arm's length were that I saw various far-left organised marxist/leninist groups using Occupy Sydney to push their own agendas such as supporting "justice for deaf lesbian Marxist Aboriginal Palestinian community members who only have one iPad and can't afford horn-rimmed glasses". I don't mind if people want to support obscure "social" issues, but don't hijack the local chapter of an international non-aligned grassroots movement to do it. We lost so much support in NSW.

Did you see them accuse that wheat farmer from Wagga of being bacon and force him out of one of those planning sessions at UTS? Then later they had a free-school on Monsanto and GM crops, but the communist dip# running it has zero practical experience of what he was "teaching". A wheat farmer from the Riverina has a unique insight on that particular topic, but he didn't fit the revolutionary marxist model of collectivisation. Man talk about snatching defeat from the jaws of victory. Worst thing was, it was people like me who became demoralised and threw in the towel because of the marxist focus that let it all happen. My revolutionary utopian dreams were shattered when I realised that any fair dinkum grassroots movement would be hijacked by the far left or the far right.

As for cointelpro, I guess it's possible. I'm pretty sure I ID'd one or more agents provocateurs online on the main OccSyd FB page.

Which one of the "leaders" was cointelpro?

Was it the charismatic Che Guevara wannabe with the red banners?
Was it the divorced Aspergers syndrome dude?
Was it the homeless anarchist?



posted on Mar, 31 2014 @ 01:08 PM
link   
reply to post by jinni73
 




Hope this answers some questions. there's lots more like this.

In the seventies a relative of mine was blackmailed into infiltrating various groups in Sydney. Eventually he did the Hilton bombing. You were all supposed to roll over and take it. What's the matter? Haven't you read the script? Why aren't you worshipping the false flag intelligence scum who only want to protect you from the imaginary terrorists?



posted on Mar, 31 2014 @ 01:43 PM
link   
reply to post by tomutheyounger
 




My revolutionary utopian dreams were shattered when I realised that any fair dinkum grassroots movement would be hijacked by the far left or the far right.


I've never been involved with Occupy simply because the infiltration rate by the authorities seemed to be sky high. Also have little faith any nicey-nicey protests will ever work. TPTB prefer nice protesters.

The only way I can see Occupy working is if they take a page out of the protest playbooks from Spain, Venezuela and the likes. In those situations it doesn't matter if there's 50-100 undercover cops, they lose control of the protests pretty quickly when people get really angry.

edit on 822pm0000pm12014 by Bassago because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 31 2014 @ 09:52 PM
link   
reply to post by Bassago
 


They didn't know what they were doing.

They should have modeled it like the fabian society or a secret society like the bavarian illuminati.

Slow passive gradual changes over time like the fabian socialists and the secretive spy vs spy tactics like weishop's illuminati structure.
It would have been slightly harder to infiltrate and subvert.



new topics

top topics



 
4

log in

join