It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
British peatland stores at least 3.2 billion tons of carbon, making it by far the country’s most important carbon sink and among the most important in the world.
But peat is also a massive store of carbon, described as Europe’s equivalent of the tropical rainforest. Wind farms, and the miles of new roads and tracks needed to service them, damage or destroy the peat and cause significant loss of carbon to the atmosphere, where it contributes to climate change.
...more than half of all British onshore wind development, current and planned, is on peat soils.
The Telegraph
Richard Lindsay of the University of East London, said: “If we are concerned about CO2, we shouldn’t be worrying first about the rainforests, we should be worrying about peatlands.
“The world’s peatlands have four times the amount of carbon than all the world’s rainforests. But they are a Cinderella habitat, completely invisible to decision- makers.”
The Telegraph
Originally posted by gladtobehere
Misleading and inaccurate thread title.
Originally posted by gladtobehere
But there are plenty of other sources of clean, renewable, limitless energy: solar, tidal and geo-thermal.
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by ollncasino
I guess they better shut down the commercial peat bogs too.
Billions of tons of carbon sequestered in the world's peat bogs could be released into the atmosphere in the coming decades as a result of global warming, according to a new analysis.
...release of even a small percentage of the carbon locked away in the world's peat bogs would dwarf emissions of manmade carbon, scientists at Harvard University, Worcester State College, and the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology write in the current issue of the journal Nature Geoscience.
Global Warming Predicted To Hasten Carbon Release From Peat Bogs
Originally posted by magma
What about Dover? Plenty of wind there.... Pretty sure it is Peatbog free too...
Originally posted by magma
I get it. It can save the environment only if it can meet with not being an eyesore. ....
What about a statement to the world. Look what we did.. We can run most of our country on wind.
Originally posted by magma
Nah.. Tuck em down in the bogs, out of mind out of site.
I guess I'll have to wait until the research is published to read it. It sounds like it's published in a respectable journal, but still I'm skeptical of the claims.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Scottish government-funded researchers from Aberdeen University will publish a report later this year stating that British wind farms create more carbon dioxide greenhouse gases than they save.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
I'm not for or against wind power. If it makes economic sense, and doesn't destroy the environment, then why not
• In certain conditions, wind turbines actually consume electricity. To protect them from damage from cold or warm spells, the machinery is heated or cooled. It is not unheard of for the daily net contribution of all the UK’s wind turbines to be negative.
• Between 2002 and 20120, the UK gave £5.6 billion in subsidies to the wind energy sector. That amounts to nearly £200,000 per worker in the sector. The government claim that their ‘Green Deal’ and other green policies will create jobs, but the evidence shows that their plans are amongst the least effective and most expensive make-work schemes ever conceived.
• The average wind turbine produces energy 75 per cent of the time. However, because wind speeds vary, a turbine’s output also varies between nothing and its capacity. The average wind turbine only produces 28 percent of its total capacity.
Link
Originally posted by butcherguy
One has to admit this, before wind power generation began to be implemented in a larger way, the environmentalists were pushing for their increased use.
Now that it is happening, there seem to be a ton of overlooked reasons for the environmentalists to oppose them.
Originally posted by magma
They do need to be located in windy areas to be efficient. Maybe the UK is just not suitable for wind farms. Unless it is in Dover, which you do not like.