It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shema
This raises an interesting question: What becomes of our non-physical body when the physical body decays? Or, put it the other way: If our non-physical body is adversely affected by an alien cosmic force what happens to our physical body?
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by Shema
Hey, you could be right, but I have a little problem with your analogy. When you look for the opposite of a human I'm thinking a human is life. And, the opposite of life is death (or non-life). Not EVERYTHING can have an opposite, because what would be the opposite of rock? People might think that the opposite of light is darkness, but darkness is merely that absence of light - darkness is not a thing.
What happens when we die? If the physical no longer exists then neither can the non-physical;
yet it is illogical to infer that they reduce to nothing if only for the obvious reason that they could not have arisen from out of nothing.
There is no scientific foundation for such law. If you feel otherwise, cite scientific sources.
Originally posted by Shema
## Everything in life has its opposite. We can call this the Law of Opposites The opposite of something might not be readily recognizabe and discovering what it is can be enlightening.
All the theories of physics say that when the universe burst into existence some fifteen billion years ago with the Big Bang, matter and antimatter existed in equal amounts. Erupting from a celestial cauldron of unfathomable temperatures, matter and antimatter materialized and then annihilated repeatedly, finally disappearing back into energy, known as the cosmic background radiation. The laws of nature require that matter and antimatter be created in pairs. But within a millifraction of a second of the Big Bang, matter somehow outnumbered its particulate opposite by a hair, so that for every billion antiparticles, there were a billion and one particles. Within a second of the creation of the universe, all the antimatter was destroyed, leaving behind only matter.
Originally posted by Astyanax
reply to post by Shema
That's a good one. Here's another: St. Anselm's ontological proof of the existence of God.
- God is the most perfect being that can be imagined.
- But if God is only imagined, then we can imagine something greater than God – the most perfect being that can be imagined, existing in reality.
- Therefore the most perfect being is one that exists in reality as well as in the imagination.
- Therefore God must exist.
Good, eh?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by Shema
This raises an interesting question: What becomes of our non-physical body when the physical body decays? Or, put it the other way: If our non-physical body is adversely affected by an alien cosmic force what happens to our physical body?
I like what Carl Sagan had to say about that.
"The cosmos is also within us
We're made of star stuff
We are a way for the cosmos to know itself
Across the sea of space
The stars are other suns
We have traveled this way before
And there is much to be learned"
Pretty profound and to the point.
Originally posted by SpearMint
I have a couple of issues with your theory.
First of all I don't believe everything does have an opposite.
Secondly, life isn't a single thing and neither are humans, both are a result of many things working together. If the law of opposites existed, then surely it wouldn't apply to things grouped together, that wouldn't really make sense.
Originally posted by smithjustinb
Rearry?
The opposite of "physical" is non"physical"? Is the opposite of star, non star? Is the opposite of spider non spider? Is the opposite of bicycle non bicycle?
I think you're searching for validation of your hopes and dreams of another world when there is none, so you make stuff up.
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by Shema
What you are trying to say is not that everything "has" an opposite, as in opposite that is somehow described by a natural law, and can objectively be determined. I guess you are trying to say that we, humans, have the mental capablilty to come up with an opposite for about everything that makes sense in some way or another to at least some of us.
But I am not sure what this has to do with science.
Originally posted by Shema
## Everything in life has its opposite. We can call this the Law of Opposites