It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wolf321
While watching some of the debates by pro-2A supporters with Pierce Morgan, and the coverage of the topic on fox news (the only source that is somewhat supportive on the matter) I don't know if it is by choice or by error, we keep arguing the debate in their (the liberal left's) terms.
We supporters of 2nd Amendment need to reclaim the terminology that better reflects the issue.
When they say assault weapon. we must say modern sporting rifles.
The Department of Homeland Security is seeking to acquire 7,000 5.56x45mm NATO “personal defense weapons” (PDW) — also known as “assault weapons” when owned by civilians.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
I rather like the term Utility Rifle myself. It hunts, target shoots, defense shoots and tears down so easy a kid could learn it in a 10 minute instruction.
Utility Rifle.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
isn't the purpose to CHANGE the perception the government and anti-crowd are pushing ?
if so, they why in the world would or should we adopt THEIR terminology ??
that makes -0- sense.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
reply to post by rival
Exactly. Then people start saying .. wait, I can't defend myself?? And they display the outrage they should.
Originally posted by Wolf321
While watching some of the debates by pro-2A supporters with Pierce Morgan, and the coverage of the topic on fox news (the only source that is somewhat supportive on the matter) I don't know if it is by choice or by error, we keep arguing the debate in their (the liberal left's) terms.
We supporters of 2nd Amendment need to reclaim the terminology that better reflects the issue.
When they say assault weapon. we must say modern sporting rifles.
When they say high capacity, we must say standard capacity.
Most importantly when they say gun control, we must say rights restrictions.
"Assault weapons" as they use it is a misnomer. "High capacity" is a catch phrase. "Gun control" is a lukewarm term that is tossed around to whitewash the fact that, as a practice, only serves to restrict and or eliminate the rights of free men.
I don't expect to see such a change by any national organization or member of the MSM. I think that it helps to remove the veil of political correctness from the eyes of people we may encounter daily when discussing the topic.
Originally posted by solomons path
Y'all do know that PDW is a real class of weapon right? The gov didn't make that up. Here are some examples of PDW's
Kriss Vector
FNH SCAR PDW
FNH PN 90
Knight PDW-8/10
They call AR and M4's "assault" and SBR's "person defense weapons" . . . however, only one is a real term.
PDW's are designed for close quarters battle, has a short (12" or less) barrel, and a lot of times fires handgun caliber rounds. Think urban warfare weapons with select burst.
If DHS is ordering PDW's . . . they aren't getting AR's. They are getting modern day uzi's . . . to mow you down with quickly.