It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It was neccesary actually...
"In 1945 ... , Secretary of War Stimson visited my headquarters in Germany, [and] informed me that our government was preparing to drop an atomic bomb on Japan. I was one of those who felt that there were a number of cogent reasons to question the wisdom of such an act.... During his recitation of the relevant facts, I had been conscious of a feeling of depression and so I voiced to him my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and second because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of 'face.' The Secretary was deeply perturbed by my attitude, almost angrily refuting the reasons I gave for my quick conclusions."
www.nuclearfiles.org...
Do you always make a beeping sound when you back up like that?
Or how the Japanese treated POW's during the war? How about the number of POWs the germans executed?
I can accept it and I have.. What you are not accepting is the fact Japan started the war, not the US. Japan and Germany BOTH had nuclear weapons programs and would have used them if they got them first.
In this case, the US got to them first.. Japan refused to surrender, so we dropped ONE bomb. They refused to surrender and we dropped a SECOND bomb. They surrendered.
As I stated and you ignored, Japan should not have started a fiught they were not prepared to finish.
No I stand by that comment.. You have actually proven my point in your response by trying to rationalize / justify the actions of all other players while somehoe making the US to be the bad person. Let me remind you that in WWI and WWII the US wanted to remain neutral and to stay out of them.
Stop bitching because the US used a weapon the other nations were trying to get to first... Had they gotten them, they would have used them on the US.. Interestingly enough if that happened I doubt you would be complaining.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
I think the US had no choice, also, it deserved to give Japan a punch in the mouth after Pearl Harbor.
Tight lipped on the subject huh? Then ask your wife point blank: Honey, do you think the U.S. was right dropping those two bombs on your cities to stop Hitlers charge?
Ya know..If I went into a country that had bombed two of my home countries cities to utter Oblivion - I would not speak of it either but only have "nice" things to say about that country. Anything less would be foolish - they could do it again!
Originally posted by SprocketUK
doing it this way saved a lot of allied lives.
Originally posted by SpearMint
Originally posted by hellobruce
This has been discussed several times before, once again the Japanese apologists/USA haters are attacking the USA.
It was not a war crime, they saved a lot of lives. Also Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both valid military targets.edit on 23-12-2012 by hellobruce because: (no reason given)
You have to be a "USA hater" to think nuking Japan was wrong?
Originally posted by daaskapital
The Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were war crimes and should have been considered as such.
Originally posted by daaskapital
The bombings should have been called of, simply because they were bombing a place with civilians.
Originally posted by AlexIR
Also you can lookup that Japan was willing to surrender even before the Enola Gay took to the sky.
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
The term "war crime" makes me laugh. It's war. People die. Get over it. If Japan had the bomb, they would have used it. The Nazis would have as well. Opposing sides will always look for some type of combat multiplier...and will use it if necessary.
Originally posted by hellobruce
Originally posted by AlexIR
Also you can lookup that Japan was willing to surrender even before the Enola Gay took to the sky.
Why didnt they then? They refused to surrender before the first bomb, they refused to surrender after the first bomb, they were going to refuse to surrender after the second bomb but the emperor intervened. there was even a attempt at a military coup to stop the emporer surrendering.
but of course the Japanese apologists/USA haters ignore this fact!