It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Later in the day a white van parked in front of Donahue's house with 8 to 10 people who were sent to clear out her house. After being stopped by a blockade made from fallen trees and non-violent resistance from activists who were occupying the home, the moving van left. It was reported that at around 3 p.m. the SWAT team arrived, forcing activists and the media to the ground. 3 arrests were made but soon released with citations. Sahara Donahue is currently seeking a place to rent and to secure her belongings.
Originally posted by Maxmars
Apparently it is all good and well that tax-payer dollars are used to protect a bank's investment.... but from what?
If the reporter on this story has any foresight, we'll see another article in 8 months about how the house is still standing there rotting and empty....
.....but some real estate investment firm bought it for the price of a used car.
Originally posted by wirefly
What do you mean"what does bank corruption have to do with it?"? Have you been under a rock for the past 5 years?
Originally posted by wirefly
On top of that, why send a freakin SWAT team in as a first measure? It was a non-violent resistance.
Originally posted by wirefly
What a bunch of pu##ies.
Originally posted by wirefly
They could have just sent a sheriff deputy.
Originally posted by wirefly
They escalate these situations intentionally by sending SWAT teams in to try to flex their muscles.
Originally posted by wirefly
When was the last time you saw a SWAT team defend a bank customer against a bank? Never.
reply to post by macman
The Sheriffs department could have been the ones to cal the SWAT team.
Originally posted by wirefly
So is that what happened? All I read in the article was that after the moving van left, the SWAT team arrived. There was no indication to the contrary.
Originally posted by wirefly
She did sign her mortgage. However, banks are not playing by the rules. They do things like refusing to accept payments and sending those mortgages into foreclosure to get the insurance money, which may very well be more than the value of the balance of the loan.
Originally posted by wirefly
Also, she was asking for an extension on her eviction as she has no place to go, not trying to rob the bank.
Originally posted by wirefly
But hey, that's cool. If that's how the bankers feel about it, then that's the way they feel. One day, they may be in a position of need and find out how it feels when nobody cares. It won't be on my shoulders though.
Originally posted by Maxmars
Apparently it is all good and well that tax-payer dollars are used to protect a bank's investment.... but from what?
If the reporter on this story has any foresight, we'll see another article in 8 months about how the house is still standing there rotting and empty....
.....but some real estate investment firm bought it for the price of a used car.
Originally posted by wirefly
reply to post by macman
The Sheriffs department could have been the ones to cal the SWAT team.
So is that what happened? All I read in the article was that after the moving van left, the SWAT team arrived. There was no indication to the contrary.
She did sign her mortgage. However, banks are not playing by the rules. They do things like refusing to accept payments and sending those mortgages into foreclosure to get the insurance money, which may very well be more than the value of the balance of the loan. Also, she was asking for an extension on her eviction as she has no place to go, not trying to rob the bank.
But hey, that's cool. If that's how the bankers feel about it, then that's the way they feel. One day, they may be in a position of need and find out how it feels when nobody cares. It won't be on my shoulders though.
No lost tears for a person that failed to uphold her end of a deal.
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by macman
No lost tears for a person that failed to uphold her end of a deal.
How about the bankers that have creamed trillions of dollars... Do you think that they should be arrested by swat teams.. Of course not they run the government and are conveniently protected by the laws that they helped to orchestrate...
Originally posted by oasisjack
reply to post by macman
Lol sorry buddy cops are the new tax man. They are also becoming the civilians #1 enemy they sure are mine and yours to in due time. Sad really so many are former armed services members who defended us now sent to enslave us.
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by macman
No lost tears for a person that failed to uphold her end of a deal.
How about the bankers that have creamed trillions of dollars... Do you think that they should be arrested by swat teams.. Of course not they run the government and are conveniently protected by the laws that they helped to orchestrate...
Originally posted by macman
Originally posted by oasisjack
reply to post by macman
Lol sorry buddy cops are the new tax man. They are also becoming the civilians #1 enemy they sure are mine and yours to in due time. Sad really so many are former armed services members who defended us now sent to enslave us.
That may be your view, but DOOM on those that fight a cop.