It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by phroziac
Im in california for the day. They of course have proposition 37 on the ballots here....which would require labeling of gmo foods. All sorts of commercials on tv about how unfair it is. Never any mention of gmo, just "omg soy milk will have to be labeled different"
Guess we dont have the right to know what were eating. I hope califoenians dont buy the propoganda...
Why is it that monsanto and friends have to lie about everything?
Originally posted by phroziac
Im in california for the day. They of course have proposition 37 on the ballots here....which would require labeling of gmo foods. All sorts of commercials on tv about how unfair it is. Never any mention of gmo, just "omg soy milk will have to be labeled different"
Guess we dont have the right to know what were eating. I hope califoenians dont buy the propoganda...
Why is it that monsanto and friends have to lie about everything?
Originally posted by chiefsmom
I really hope this passes in California, so other states may get the idea.
Would love to have it here in MI.
Originally posted by camaro68ss
im on the fence for 37. I like the food to be labled but it goes against my believes in government intervention. I would like to believe there is a free market solution to this. This would start with a company starting to label there foods and consumers purchasing these goods from the company intern rewarding them for informing consumers. Its easy, here is product A that is grown in a lab, its a little cheaper but you will grow a third arm, and here is product B that is all natural but you might have to pay a little bit more.
Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by phroziac
the entire world has been eating GMO foods since the dawn of agriculture