It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WeaselSpencer
reply to post by bigfatfurrytexan
"Human crops", very profound and very true. Can you say more about how SDI was offensive? Thanks BFFT.
Originally posted by WeaselSpencer
reply to post by choos
The guy's point is valid. I don't get yours.
If one detonates a nuke or shines a laser on an ICBM the missile is blinded.
It doesn't mean the mIssiles are not accurate choos. It means the general stories we are told are not accurate. His point about the astronauts is interesting.
Might be something to it. Don't you think SDI was a cover for something real ? I like this approach. Needs work . Maybe SDI was defensive but focused on methods to disable or Interfere with the guidance systems.
Maybe the Apollo sat turns launched lasers computers nukes all 3.
The part about blinding the nukes may not be a major breakthrough, but the part about this all explaining the astronaut stories with their seeing and then sometimes not seeing stars would be huge.
No one has ever been able to fully explain that.
Looks as though this guy may be on to something.
Investigators going back to Rene have pointed out the problem with the astronauts' accounts of star visibility. But no one has ever convincingly explained why the astronauts would make up stories about star visibility.
I like this approach. Time will tell if it pans out.