9/11 Photo Proof Plane was real (?) Any experts to confirm?

page: 1
1

log in

join

posted on Jun, 6 2012 @ 10:01 PM
link   


I was on Tumblr (blogging site) and that picture appeared up on my dashboard, and it had over 200,000+ notes, so it's been seen by many. Can anyone confirm the authenticity of this picture?




posted on Jun, 6 2012 @ 10:03 PM
link   



posted on Jun, 6 2012 @ 10:06 PM
link   
lol



posted on Jun, 6 2012 @ 10:06 PM
link   



posted on Jun, 6 2012 @ 10:08 PM
link   
Thanks guys was just wondering :]



posted on Jun, 6 2012 @ 10:23 PM
link   
reply to post by iAnjo
 


Observation deck was on the South Tower - it did not open until 9:30 am

The plane struck the South Tower at 9:03, long before the observation deck was open



posted on Jun, 6 2012 @ 10:40 PM
link   
That photo has been in circulation for along time.If a passport can survive,then I guess so can a camera.LOL

player.vimeo.com... Guess again, watch this and you'll never trust your eyes again.
edit on 6-6-2012 by 13th Zodiac because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 6 2012 @ 10:43 PM
link   
#1 The plane seems aimed way too high on the building.

#2 How did they get the film out?

#3 Good photoshop.

#4 Debunked throughly years ago.



posted on Jun, 6 2012 @ 10:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Lazarus Short
 


It was obviously a digital camera.

memory card?



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 05:06 AM
link   
Famous fake

Nothing more to add



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 08:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by magma
reply to post by Lazarus Short
 


It was obviously a digital camera.

memory card?



It's far from obvious, and if you're talking about the date in the lower-right corner of the photo, databack cameras predate the digital era - I had a film camera myself which imprinted the date. But if the camera was digital, they must have tossed the memory card over the rail, to be found among all the debris, rather like the undamaged passport of that "terrorist" which the FBI so conveniently found. It's all clear to me now!
edit on 7-6-2012 by Lazarus Short because: lah-de-dah



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 10:44 AM
link   
It is a well know fake, and it has been known to be a fake almost since it started appearing just after 9/11.

Here is a link to the REAL undoctored photo.

The actual image was taken in late November, 1997....which is more fitting for the individuals clothes. And, the first plane struck WTC 1. WTC 1 did not have a top floor observation deck. That was WTC 2. You can see the actual observation deck in the images from the link above.



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 02:36 AM
link   
Looks like somebody wanted to provide additional meat for the OS account...


That is one sad fake...



posted on Jun, 8 2012 @ 04:42 AM
link   
reply to post by iAnjo
 


what does "prayf" and "rjapan" mean? which language is that?





new topics
top topics
 
1

log in

join