It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Submarines
Unfortunatly, he is just another career politician.
These are the people that NEED to be gone.
I sometimes can't believe how stupid we Americans are...
Originally posted by VonDoomen
another thing your not taking into account. I have heard paul say this many times.
His personal beliefs are not always his public political beliefs. I have heard him say many times that personally he is against abortion. He would LIKE/PREFER to see it stopped. However, his political belief is that it should be up to the states to decide its legality as it is not a federal issue. If they wanted to take it a step further, it would require change in the Supreme court or an amendment in the constitution. If this is really your best example of Paul "Flip flopping" then i am done reading this thread as it lacks sustenance.
Originally posted by Kaploink
The one problem I have with Ron Paul is his view on social/religious issues with abortion being one of them. Another being that he doesn't believe in separation of church and state. Which really makes me wonder when push comes to shove would he choose to supports the rights of the people or religion.
Originally posted by VonDoomen
another thing your not taking into account. I have heard paul say this many times.
His personal beliefs are not always his public political beliefs. I have heard him say many times that personally he is against abortion. He would LIKE/PREFER to see it stopped. However, his political belief is that it should be up to the states to decide its legality as it is not a federal issue. If they wanted to take it a step further, it would require change in the Supreme court or an amendment in the constitution. If this is really your best example of Paul "Flip flopping" then i am done reading this thread as it lacks sustenance.
Originally posted by ErgoTheConfusion
EDIT: Listening again... will update after further thought.
Post Edit: This comment is indeed curious... as he's been rock steady that his goal is to pass it back to states.
I think if I'm to understand what he's getting at here, is that he is wanting the minds of people to shift to view abortion as a violent act... and then treat it like Slavery and Murder on the federal level, which prohibits that and does not allow States to legalize slavery or murder.
Regardless of agreement or disagreement... that is the approach when taking in the full context of the speech... and it seems in line with what the government *would* have the power to do if society changed to view abortion as murder similar to society changing to view Slavery as inhumane and cruel and outlawing it.
The debate over which circumstances are justifiable (health, rape, etc) would continue to rage on... just like the debate on "justifiable self defense resulting in a homicide" continues to rage on (though not as impassioned).
The deal with Ron Paul is he doesn't speak at a middle school level like most politicians, and has a lot of nuance to his stances and approaches and require getting to know him similar to any person in your life where minor interactions give one impression, but getting to know them reveals a much more cohesive picture.
Namasteedit on 2012/5/2 by ErgoTheConfusion because: (no reason given)
"While Roe v. Wade is invalid, a federal law banning abortion across all 50 states would be equally invalid."
He is just making it a states rights decision until they can get a supreme court in favor of a nationwide ban or get the constitution ammended,