OP/ED: This is by no other means, Murder.

You are right on the last one I agree with you US does not have many friends anymore after the iraq fiasco.

Originally posted by marg6043
Nygdan,

Not matter what you called it or painted people are dying in Iraq and that is a fact, now do you know who to blame?

US brought terrorism into Iraq.

Now I have been posting less, reading more, but this idea that the U.S. brought terrorism to Iraq is a good one. I LOVE the fact the terrorists are in Iraq, it is the region from whence they spawn and thrive, and for the U.S. to kill them there is an excellent idea.

smokenmirrors,

Actually terrorist attacks did not started in Iraq until the US invation,

Second it was not terrorist attacks during Sadam because he was the one doing the terror.

It was not link of Sadam and terrorist groups in Iraq.

And the fact is that they came into Iraq through the open borders after invation or either they were living under the sands of the desert. But then again we call Iraqi terrorist now, hummm perhaps they were all along in the population waiting to strike back the liberators.

What you think?

Originally posted by marg6043
US does not have many friends anymore after the iraq fiasco.

Well, the ones that didn't stick around weren't very good friends anyway, so whats the difference right?

Actually terrorist attacks did not started in Iraq until the US invation

Because saddam proved that he would pour toxic gas on entire cities, have his thugs rape the women of dissidents, and generally otherwise kill maim and torture. The US could certainly apply these methods on a much grander scale and with much more efficiency. Heck, even without and official policy to do so look at what those enterprising individuals at abu garib were able to accomlish! And thats without people processing plants and gas chambers!

But that would be a bad idea. Kind of strange that you should seem to be proposing it as being a good way to keep terrorism out of iraq there marg.