It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by Count Chocula
I could argue very well that if the USA had not got involved in World War I then Germany might have been able to achieve a stalemate against the Brits and French and there would have been no feckless Wiemar Germany and almost certainly no rise of Hitler.
Originally posted by seabag
The way to stop a bully is through strength…period.
Originally posted by LibertyCrazy
I think that the post does a great job of expressing the misconception about Dr. Paul's foreign policy positions. He is very simply NOT AN ISOLATIONIST. He understands that the world has changed and that our nation can no longer afford and no longer needs to provide for the common defense of Japan, South Carolina and Northern Europe. We need to bring those troops home to better provide for our own national security.
He also believes that we should continue to be a strong ally to our friends, and most importantly he believes that if our government plans to initiate or respond to hostilities that it should follow the constitutional process required by law.
I'm sorry but I just can't view these concepts as radical, they seem so common sense to me that I worry that either by choice or by agenda so many people of chosen to diminish them.
Originally posted by Count Chocula
reply to post by seabag
What a bunch of hogwash. I could argue very well that if the USA had not got involved in World War I then Germany might have been able to achieve a stalemate against the Brits and French and there would have been no feckless Wiemar Germany and almost certainly no rise of Hitler.
Furthermore, a German victory or negotiated peace in World War I would have almost certainly prevented the formation of the Soviet Union, so you see the policy of sticking our noses in where it doesnt belong can and usually does have even worse consequences on down the road. It is for that reason our founding fathers in all their wisdom warned us about foreign entanglements.
It's also becoming apparent that you neocons won't stop until the entire world is in flames, but just remember you're going to fall along with the rest of us.
Originally posted by buster2010
So people that want to see the facts that Israel claim about Iran to be believed is living behind a smoke screen? How can you call the facts that people produce no logic? Iran building the bomb is just propaganda without proof to back it up.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Carry on, then, and don't forget to check in the closet and under the bed for those zionists before you go to sleep at night.
Originally posted by buster2010
Just because we were in a war doesn't mean we can't receive aid or have commerce with other nations. Starting a nation costs a lot of money and at that time France and Spain had the money also the love hate relationship between England and these countries help to get America both gold and weapons.
Originally posted by nenothtu
Originally posted by buster2010
Just because we were in a war doesn't mean we can't receive aid or have commerce with other nations. Starting a nation costs a lot of money and at that time France and Spain had the money also the love hate relationship between England and these countries help to get America both gold and weapons.
Don't get me wrong, I'm against most alliances as well. However, claiming that the founding fathers refused alliances is hogwash, as I clearly demonstrated, and your "refutation" here quoted verifies.
Originally posted by Tw0Sides
Originally posted by nenothtu
Carry on, then, and don't forget to check in the closet and under the bed for those zionists before you go to sleep at night.
Call them what you want, Zionist, Israeli's, they are in the fore front of this, to not include them in the conversation is denial.
Originally posted by nenothtu
What are you considering to be "blowback", and why?
Communication and transportation do not obviate war, they facilitate it.
Why? Why should "the world" intervene in someone else's fight, intervene in private problems?
A One-World Government is something I will always oppose, as will my children. With any luck and decent education, so will their children, and grandchildren after that. If that's what you have in mind, you have a rough road ahead. We'll fight it at every turn. Such a government is far too dangerous and ultimately divisive.
Oh. If it's not any more effective or dangerous than Anon, I guess we really have nothing to worry about. Let the NWO do a DDoS oof this website or that for a day or two at a time, and the rest of us will be chugging right along without those sites. We managed before they ever existed, and can manage after they're gone.
Bingo! That is precisely why a One World Government will never work. The world is chock full of humans, each an individual. There are a plethora of cultures and philosophies. There is no such critter as a "one size fits all" government.
"Reacting instantly" implies an ability to react. Merely being informed may give reason to react, but it in no way provides ability to react.
As per your whole "if we bring everyone home then when SHTF somewhere we'll be that much later to the party". The Navy would really be the only branch of the service that needs to be in international waters to be ready for this type of scenario. The rest of the military could be deployed anywhere in the world within 72 hours if the proper protocols were developed and practiced to achieve that goal.
Impossible without FOB's and staging areas. Even with them, you can only get a very small force in play in a 72 hour time frame. That small force can be wiped from the face of the earth in quite a lot less time than the 72 hours it took to get it there with no possibility for reinforcement, backup, or supply. This is why we always see "build-ups" prior to any sort of large scale action. It takes more than 72 hours to get a naval contingent on the scene unless they are already in the vicinity - i.e. were already expecting trouble there.
Blocking "the growing pains of a global culture" is not detrimental to humanity. Diversity enhances the chance that humanity will survive. Who do you propose runs this "global culture"? How will you feel when it is co-opted by the Next Great Fascist regime, and the central control for the entire world is already in place, courtesy of the Globalist Utopia Dreamers Society (Inc,)?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by Count Chocula
When a war with Iran breaks out let me know.
edit on 22-1-2012 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)