It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

UK cops want to use special law to force The Guardian to reveal their source in the 9/11 phone hack

page: 1
5

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 17 2011 @ 08:48 PM
link   
Because of course, The Guardian exposed the MET police as a bunch of corrupt and incompetent cops and they certainly don't like it, so they are trying to get some payback, and destroy freedom of the press at the same time.

Hacking: Met use Official Secrets Act to demand Guardian reveals sources

Unprecedented move sees Scotland Yard use the Official Secrets Act to demand the paper hands over information

The Metropolitan police are seeking a court order under the Official Secrets Act to make Guardian reporters disclose their confidential sources about the phone-hacking scandal.

In an unprecedented legal attack on journalists' sources, Scotland Yard officers claim the act, which has special powers usually aimed at espionage, could have been breached in July when reporters Amelia Hill and Nick Davies revealed the hacking of Milly Dowler's phone. They are demanding source information be handed over.

The Guardian's editor, Alan Rusbridger, said on Friday: "We shall resist this extraordinary demand to the utmost".

Tom Watson, the former Labour minister who has been prominent in exposing hacking by the News of the World, said: "It is an outrageous abuse and completely unacceptable that, having failed to investigate serious wrongdoing at the News of the World for more than a decade, the police should now be trying to move against the Guardian. It was the Guardian who first exposed this scandal."

The NUJ general secretary, Michelle Stanistreet, said: "This is a very serious threat to journalists and the NUJ will fight off this vicious attempt to use the Official Secrets Act … Journalists have investigated the hacking story and told the truth to the public. They should be congratulated rather than being hounded and criminalised by the state.

The paper's revelation in July that police had never properly pursued the News of the World for hacking the phone of the missing murdered girl caused a wave of public revulsion worldwide.

The ensuing uproar over police inadequacy and alleged collusion with the Murdoch media empire swept away the top officers at Scotland Yard. It also brought about the closure of the News of the World itself, the withdrawal of the Murdoch takeover bid for Sky, and the launch of a major judicial inquiry into the entire scandal.

Metropolitan police commissioner Sir Paul Stephenson and assistant commissioner John Yates both resigned. David Cameron's former PR chief Andy Coulson is among those who have subsequently been arrested for questioning, along with former News International chief executive Rebekah Brooks.


The thugs are going for some payback... The Guardian, MOST OF THE WORLD SUPPORTS YOU!! Keep up the good fight and tell those fascists to go to hell!
edit on 17-9-2011 by Vitchilo because: (no reason given)

edit on 17-9-2011 by Vitchilo because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2011 @ 08:53 PM
link   
This is great, thanks for posting.


I have never actually read the Guardian, even though I live in the UK. Is it unbiased?
edit on 17-9-2011 by Wide-Eyes because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2011 @ 09:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


this is good and worrying at the same time.
i wish we could look at the real issues tho.
sure phone hacking is f'd up but the opinion pushing and manipulation that the media does is worse



posted on Sep, 17 2011 @ 09:09 PM
link   

Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
This is great, thanks for posting.


I have never actually read the Guardian, even though I live in the UK. Is it unbiased?
edit on 17-9-2011 by Wide-Eyes because: (no reason given)

It's pretty good...

Biased like all newspaper, but not very much.



posted on Sep, 20 2011 @ 05:22 AM
link   
reply to post by Vitchilo
 


Thanks for the reply. I noticed yesterday that the Guardian actually reported 'Occupy Wall Street' without taking the piss.
edit on 20-9-2011 by Wide-Eyes because: Grammar correction




top topics
 
5

log in

join