It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hellhound604
reply to post by sbctinfantry
The reality of EMP is not really that big a deal. Any well-shielded device can survive EMP, it is the wires that leads in/out of it that acts as antennas and conduct the EMP inside. It is not impossible to design electronic systems that can survive EMP, heck, the avionics industry has had to design EMP-proof avionics for a long time now. (just Google standards like DO-160D, etc), and that is NOT even the highest standards there are. (If you had to purchase electronic devices for an airplane, ever wondered why it is so damn expensive?, ask any designer of DO-106D qualified avionics, and he/she will tell you that a huge part of those costs goes into the protection circuitry) Gamma-rays are more of a threat to electronics, and that can be overcome too, at a huge cost.
If you want the modern world to be totally EMP-proof, there is one solution, go back to vacuum-valves, or maybe DNA-computers
Originally posted by Hellhound604
reply to post by sbctinfantry
If you know better than that my friend, then you are a lot more qualified than me, and I will keep my silence.
edit on 8/8/2011 by Hellhound604 because: (no reason given)edit on 8/8/2011 by Hellhound604 because: (no reason given)
Although vacuum tubes are far more resistant to EMP than solid state devices, other components in vacuum tube circuitry can be damaged by EMP. Vacuum tube equipment actually was damaged in 1962 nuclear EMP testing. Also, the solid state PRC-77 VHF manpackable 2-way radio survived extensive EMP testing. The earlier PRC-25, nearly identical except for a vacuum tube final amplification stage, had been tested in EMP simulators but was not certified to remain fully functional.
Source : en.wikipedia.org...