It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Punisher75
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
I don't know how true that is, seems to me that most of his supporters just don't like to hear the criticisms.
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
Originally posted by Punisher75
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
I don't know how true that is, seems to me that most of his supporters just don't like to hear the criticisms.
You miss the point. This thread is billed as 'evidence' of Obama not attending harvard, but it provides no such evidence. IT just provides examples of a few mis-speaks. IF that's the best criticisms of Obamamer you can come up with, then he must be doing great!
My point, of course, (which I was already quite explicit about, but perhaps you missed it)is that spend so much time criticizing ANY POTUS over a few mis-speaks while avoiding criticism of actual POLICY is a distraction, at best.
Originally posted by Sparky63
It shows that Obama is not much different than Bush. If you talk long enough you are bound to make mistakes.
The difference is in how the media spins it. When Bush says something stupid it is clear evidence that he is a moron. However, when Obama says something stupid it is because his mind is so brilliant that his mouth cannot keep up. Any mistakes he makes can thus be overlooked.
I love how unbiased the media is. LOL
Originally posted by nahsik
It's like accusing someone is an idiot for making a simple verbal or written mistake.edit on 5-6-2011 by nahsik because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sparky63
Remember the euphoria the media had when Dan Quale told some kid that "Potato" was actually spelled, "Potatoe"?
He was mocked and ridiculed and called all kinds of names over this simple little mistake.
However when Hillary clearly lied and said that she had to dodge sniper fire when getting off the plane in Bosnia, the media largely ignored it.
Bush has said some pretty dumb things, but so has Obama. I think that is why their handlers try to keep them on a short leash.
Originally posted by Punisher75
reply to post by Kitilani
You would be right except he said nothing about this....
www.denvercriminaldefenselawblog.com...
Thus showing his Bias.
Originally posted by Punisher75
reply to post by Kitilani
Nope you just missed the point is all. So I will break it down for you in a simple equation.
Obama don't like guns = Obama wont make comment about stupid cop. So its not unrelated, you just don't see the relation.
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by Punisher75
"The Cambridge police acted stupidly." —commenting on a white police officer's arrest of black scholar Henry Louis Gates Jr. at his home in Cambridge, Mass., at a news conference, July 22, 2009
This one is quite curious. The police arrested a man in his own home for breaking in. Obama called that "acting stupidly."
And...?
Was it genius to arrest a guy for breaking into his own house? How smart does a cop have to be to look at the address on his license or maybe some pictures on the walls?edit on 6-6-2011 by Kitilani because: (no reason given)
Of course I kinda figured out after your second or third response to me that Obama could say pretty much anything and you would make an excuse for him, so really I am not surprised.
Its okay your entitled to your political opinions of the man, and I understand I used to be the same way about my favorite politician/commentator/sports team. Anyway have a nice night anyway, I know that nothing I say will make you see that the medias bias for the guy and that he is indeed as stupid if not more so than the POTUS that came before him. Really the only person who could do that for you is Obama himself, but my gut tells me you would just assume he is being humble.
Oh and as far as the "cut and paste" your right I did, your point would be what that I did not put forth the effort to type it all?
did you write the two books about Bushisms that you referenced?
you know what...it don't matter your the type who would starve to death turning your nose up to soup because it was made by Campbells and cuss out the Samaritan who warmed it up for you.
The evidence is there medicine just taste bad sometimes I know.
edit on 7-6-2011 by Punisher75 because: just to add...
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
just more substance-less nonsense from those who dislike Obama but dont understand policy enough to make an educated, informed critique.
Originally posted by Kitilani
I did not miss your point. I acknowledge your point had nothing to do with what I asked. Let me show you the question again and maybe this time it will make some sense.
This one is quite curious. The police arrested a man in his own home for breaking in. Obama called that "acting stupidly."
And...?
I have no clue what you are ranting about. I really do not even have a clue. I asked you a very simple question. Your responses have been tangents about other things, culminating in an accusation of "bias." I did not ask about "bias." My question was really really really simple. Why can't you grasp it?
Originally posted by Kitilani
No, you did not credit the person that actually did the work, nor did you apparently read any of it. That was my point and you should know that because I said that was my point.