It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The armed forces, numbering no more than 1,000, would be deployed to secure the delivery of aid supplies, would not be engaged in a combat role but would be authorised to fight if they or their humanitarian wards were threatened. "It would be to secure sea and land corridors inside the country," said an EU official.
Under a policy going back several years but seldom used, Brussels has a roster of battle groups, with two on permanent standby, comprising a force of about 1,500. The main battle group that would be deployed is German-dominated, which could trigger a row.
Originally posted by Regenstorm
Before they walked into Libya the MSM said it would be a piece of cake because Khadaffi's army is in bad shape and has old material. So why does it take so long to invade/liberate Libya?
The deployment of German soldiers, hmhmm, those are technically speaking mercenaries because they don't represent a true sovereign country but the BRD GmbH©. Interesting game...
The next major step will come eventually from Russia which will invade Europe with the same right the western allies invaded Libya.edit on 19-4-2011 by Regenstorm because: grammar
Originally posted by princeofpeace
Russi to invade Europe? Under what basis and why do you think so? I highly doubt this.
Originally posted by Regenstorm
Before they walked into Libya the MSM said it would be a piece of cake because Khadaffi's army is in bad shape and has old material. So why does it take so long to invade/liberate Libya?
The deployment of German soldiers, hmhmm, those are technically speaking mercenaries because they don't represent a true sovereign country but the BRD GmbH©. Interesting game...
The next major step will come eventually from Russia which will invade Europe with the same right the western allies invaded Libya.edit on 19-4-2011 by Regenstorm because: grammar
But among the names of banks that got tens of billions in loans from the Fed in order to stay afloat was at least one few expected: The Central Bank of Libya.
In the 18 months following the collapse of Lehman Brothers, a foreign subsidiary of the bank of the government of Muammar Gaddafi received a cumulative $35 billion in short-term loans from the Fed. Libya's Central bank received the loans through a foreign subsidiary called the Arab Banking Corp., which has a branch in New York. At the time of the financial crisis, the bank was 29% owned by the Libyan government. But since then the Libyan government has upped its stake in ABC, as it is known, to 59%. So the main beneficiary of the Fed's help is the Libyan government.
Bail them out and then bomb them?
And the bailing out of the Libyan Govt. was only less than 3 months ago
Does this make any sense to anyone????